Physics Question!!!

A block of mass $m$ is attached to a spring and kept in horizontal position in a vertical plane. When the block is allowed to then, find the maximum extension in the spring.

Details--

1) Spring's constant= $k$

2) Natural length of spring= $l$

img

I was trying to make a problem using some concepts of Work Energy and Circular motion and I came up with this. Here is my approach, please tell me if I am right or not.

First of all, the extension in the spring will be maximum when radial velocity ( $v_{r}$ ) will be zero. Now the work is only done by conservative forces in this situation so we can conserve energy.

$mg(l+x)cos \theta=\frac{mV_{0}^{2}}{2}+\frac{kx^{2}}{2}$

Now $V_{0}^{2}=V_{t}^{2}+V_{r}^{2}$

The extension will be maximum when $V_{r}=0$ . So this does not implies that the velocity of the block is zero at the lower most position. Also we can see that only a component of $mg$ is acting in the tangential direction which is responsible for tangential velocity and tangential acceleration. So $V_{t}$ is not going to be zero at the lower most position.

If we consider torque about point $O$ then

$mgsin\theta (l+x)=\frac { dL }{ dt }$

$mgsin\theta (l+x)=\frac { dI }{ dt } \omega +I\frac { d\omega }{ dt }$

$I=m{ (l+x) }^{ 2 }$

$\frac { dI }{ dt } =m(2x{ v }_{ r }+2l{ v }_{ r })$

$mgsin\theta (l+x)=2m(x+l){ v }_{ r }\omega +I\frac { d\omega }{ dt }$

I got this equation. There is a term of $v_{r}$ in the equation that has to related with $\omega$ or $\theta$ to solve the problem.

Although the motion is not circular but if consider the motion of the block for a very small interval of time then we can assume that it's a circular motion so $v_{t}=(l+x) \omega$ . Can we do so?

Using this we can express $V_{r}$ in term of angular velocity. But still there is term containing $x$ there. How can this be solved?

Am I overlooking some thing very obvious? Because using calculus in spring problem often gets very complicated.

Markdown

Appears as

*italics* or _italics_

italics

**bold** or __bold__

bold


- bulleted
- list

bulleted
list


1. numbered
2. list

numbered
list

Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)

example link

> This is a quote

This is a quote

    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"

# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"

Math

Appears as

Remember to wrap math in $ ... $ or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.

2 \times 3

2 \times 3

2^{34}

2^{34}

a_{i-1}

a_{i-1}

\frac{2}{3}

\frac{2}{3}

\sqrt{2}

\sqrt{2}

\sum_{i=1}^3

\sum_{i=1}^3

\sin \theta

\sin \theta

\boxed{123}

\boxed{123}

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

Markdown	Appears as
`italics` or `_italics_`	italics
`bold` or `__bold__`	bold
- bulleted - list	bulleted list
1. numbered 2. list	numbered list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1 paragraph 2	paragraph 1 paragraph 2
`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`	example link
`> This is a quote`	This is a quote
# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"	# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"

Math	Appears as
Remember to wrap math in `$` ... `$` or `\[` ... `\]` to ensure proper formatting.
`2 \times 3`	$2 \times 3$
`2^{34}`	$2^{34}$
`a_{i-1}`	$a_{i-1}$
`\frac{2}{3}`	$\frac{2}{3}$
`\sqrt{2}`	$\sqrt{2}$
`\sum_{i=1}^3`	$\sum_{i=1}^3$
`\sin \theta`	$\sin \theta$
`\boxed{123}`	$\boxed{123}$

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

@Mvs Saketh @Ronak Agarwal @Shashwat Shukla @karan shekhawat @Kushal Patankar @Sudeep Salgia @Tanishq Varshney @Raghav Vaidyanathan @Gautam Sharma @Azhaghu Roopesh M @Everyone . Please reply.

satvik pandey - 5 years, 5 months ago

@satvik pandey i suppose whatever you have said till now is correct..!!
It is a case of Coriolis force.. When the particle has radial speed as well then the acceleration is written as

Therefore we cannot write the equation of centripetal force as discussed before..!!

Rohit Gupta - 5 years, 4 months ago

Yes Carioles component comes in to when the sliding part is curved. Can this problem be transformed in a such a mechanism ?

Niranjan Khanderia - 5 years, 4 months ago

Thank you ! Sir. Sorry for delay in replying. You got equation using polar co-ordinates. right?

Sir, could you please help me here.

satvik pandey - 5 years, 4 months ago

Could you post whole analysis(solution) of the problem (along with calculation).

We can use $g sin \theta =da_{t}/dt$ and substitute $a_{t}=(l+x) \alpha$ by approximation but still we get the same situation.

I think that should be $\frac{dv_r}{dt} = gcos\theta-kx/m$

And $\frac{dv_t}{dt} = gsin \theta$

You should go with energy conservation , thats easier

Kushal Patankar - 5 years, 5 months ago

I wrote $\frac { { da }_{ t } }{ dt }$ by mistake.

I tried to use energy conservation. But here entire gravitational energy in not getting converted to spring potential energy only. A part of it is also converted to kinetic energy. I think the extension will be maximum when the radial velocity would be zero.right? But this does not implies that tangential velocity would also be zero at that moment.

Let $x$ be tha maximum extension in the spring then-

$mg(l+x)=\frac{mv_{t}^{2}+kx^{2}}{2}$ . There are two variables $v_{t} and x$ . And we have only one equation.

What do you think? @Kushal Patankar

@Satvik Pandey – Cetripetal accleration equation will give the relation between $v_t$ and x %6

I made Vr zero.

@Kushal Patankar – How could I miss that!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you Kushal for helping.

@Kushal Patankar – I have one more confusion.

The motion of the block is not a pure circular motion which increases the intricacy of the problem.

I think we can not just equate $kx$ and $mgcos \theta$ to centripetal force. There is acceleration other that centripetal acceleration in radial direction because the block is performing radial motion also.

I think the equation should be

$mgcos\theta -kx=m\left\{ \frac { d\vec { { V }_{ r } } }{ dt } -\frac { { V }_{ t }^{ 2 } }{ (l+x) } \right\}$

Taking radially outward as +ve direction.

What do you think, Kushal??

@Satvik Pandey – What is the need for that equation , I mean that mechanical energy conservation does all our work. And I think that the equation u made is correct for intermediate radial acceleration.

@Kushal Patankar – How you got the second equation??

The radial velocity is zero at the lower most position but this doesn't implies that radial acceleration $\frac { \vec { { dV }_{ r } } }{ dt }$ is also zero at that point. Am I missing some thing very obvious? :(

There are two $V_r$ s ? Why should radial velocity be zero in all positions ?

Niranjan Khanderia - 5 years, 5 months ago

$V_{r}$ and $v_{r}$ both represents radial velocity. In order to achieve maximum extension in the spring the radial velocity of the block should be zero at a particular point. It is not zero through out the motion.

In the sketch both $V_r$ look the same.

My handwriting is not very good. Velocity of the block along the spring is $v_{r}$ and velocity of the block tangential to the spring is $v_{t}$ .

Thank you.

You are welcome!!! :)

Satvik Please answer my to my comment in this

Rajdeep Dhingra - 5 years, 5 months ago

The total velocity is sum of the squares of radial and tangential velocities, just like x and y components in Cartesian co-ordinates.

Then use $V_{t}=R \omega$ . :)

What is $V_{\phi}$ ? What is it responsible for ?

@Rajdeep Dhingra – It is radial velocity. It is responsible for the radial movement of the particle.

I think you cannot assume that the motion is circular, however small the interval you take. I for one think that maximum extension will occur at bottom-most position.

Raghav Vaidyanathan - 5 years, 5 months ago

Even if the motion is not completely circular then I think we can use $V=R \omega$ . Like we did here. Can we ??

I too thought that the extension will be maximum at the bottom most position. But when I thought about that after watching Kushal comment, deeply then I don't see a way to justify that. :(

@satvik pandey Check out the 2-D spring simulation on this page.

Thanks for the link! This proves that the extension is maximum at the bottom most position. :D

But what about the calculation and explanation??

Try to use lagrangian mechanics. Find the total kinetic energy and take the total potential energy and apply the E-L equations. There are too many forces to equate. A spring pendulum is a hard mechanical system to crack.

Krishna Karthik - 1 year, 11 months ago

There is a good video on youtube comparing Newtonian and Lagrangian mechanics on the example of the elastic pendulum, which the example here is.

Math	Appears as
Remember to wrap math in `\(` ... `\)` or `\[` ... `\]` to ensure proper formatting.
`2 \times 3`	$2 \times 3$
`2^{34}`	$2^{34}$
`a_{i-1}`	$a_{i-1}$
`\frac{2}{3}`	$\frac{2}{3}$
`\sqrt{2}`	$\sqrt{2}$
`\sum_{i=1}^3`	$\sum_{i=1}^3$
`\sin \theta`	$\sin \theta$
`\boxed{123}`	$\boxed{123}$