Hi people! I'm new to probability and so while going through conditional probability I found the following problem which I solved by arguing directly without using any results of Conditional Probability ............unfortunately the answer wasn't given. The problem goes as:

There are 4 friends A,B,C, D and a referee. A puts a '+' or a '-' sign on a piece of paper and passes it to B who perhaps changes the sign and passes the slip to C, who may change the sign and passes it to D. D perhaps changes the sign and finally passes the slip to the referee. Suppose 2/3 is the prob. of writing a '+' by A and each of B,C,D changes the sign by prob 1/3 independently. If the referee notices a '+' sign on the slip, then find the prob that A wrote a '+' on the slip.

I would really appreciate if someone gave me the solution. Also assuming the same conditions, what would then be the ans, instead of 4 friends if n friends did the same thing.

No vote yet

4 votes

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestThis is my first impression of how to solve it. I'm not sure my numbers are all right, but I'm fairly sure this should be the approach:

The chance that a referee saw '+' is the chance that it was '+' originally and was changed 0 or 2 times, or the chance that it was '-' originally and was changed 1 or 3 times.

The first of these has chance \(2/3\) (chance that A wrote '+') times the sum of \((2/3)^3\) and \(3\cdot(1/3)^2\cdot 2/3\) (chance that it was changed 0 times or 2 times). Thus, the chance that A wrote '+' and the referee saw '+' is equal to \(28/81\).

The second has chance \(1/3\) (chance that A wrote '-') times the sum of \((1/3)^3\) and \(3\cdot(2/3)^2 \cdot 1/3\) (chance that it was changed 3 times or 1 time). This chance is \(12 / 81\).

Thus, the total chance that the referee saw '+' is \(40/81\). The chance that the referee saw '+'

andA wrote '+' is \(28/81\), so the chance that A wrote '+'giventhe referee saw '+' is \((28 / 81) / (40 / 81) = 7 / 10\).(Note the general identity \(P(A \ \mathrm{and}\ B) = P(A) \cdot P(B | A)\), in this case \(A\) is that the referee saw '+' and \(B\) is the chance that A wrote '+.')To generalize this, note that the chance that the number of changes is odd is 1 minus the chance that the number of changes is even. The only difficulty is calculating one without knowing the other. Since the chance of changing is not \(1/2\), the sum cannot be collapsed due to symmetry. If there are \(n\) middlemen (in this case, \(n = 3\)), then the chance of no changes is given by the first, third, etc. terms in the binomial expansion of \((2/3 + 1/3)^n\). The eventual answer will be the quotient of \(2/3\) times the even change chance and the sum of \(2/3\) times the even change chance plus \(1/3\) times the odd change chance.

Log in to reply

Thanks Alexander, thanks a lot!........My solution was HIGHLY incorrect!!

Log in to reply

Good question man............

Log in to reply