The regular pentagram was the badge of the Pythogoreans.But the Pythagoreans first thought that all the rations were rational,i.e,\(x = \frac{a}{b}\). where a nd b are rational numbers.

Clearly this fraction must follow the equation for the golden ratio(It's a property of the pentagram),and hence we get \[a^{2} = ab+b^{2}\]

If \(a\) and \(b\) are of different parity clearly this leads to a contradiction.Also the assumption that \(a\) and \(b\) are odd also leads to a contradiction.

Hence both \(a\) and \(b\) must be even,that is \(a = 2a_1\) and \(b = 2b_1\),where \(a_1 < a\) and \(b_1 < b\).

Substituting this into the equation and cancelling we get \[a_1^{2} = a_1b_1 + b_1^{2}\].

Now the same logic may be applied to this equation also which gives \(a_1 = 2a_2\) and \(b_1 = 2b_2\) where \(a_2 <a_1\) and \(b_2 < b_1\).

So we obtain an infinitely decreasing sequence of positive integers,ie \(a>a_1>a_2>a_3>.....\) and \(b>b_1>b_2>b_3>...........\).

Clearly no such infinitely decreasing sequence exists for positive integers.

For more details on this approach you may choose to read my note on Fermat's Method of Infinite Descent

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestNice note! But in my opinion, the note jumps out on you, does its job and then runs away.

Additional background, like what the golden ratio is, what a pentagram is and how these two are related would have been helpful.

This note proves that golden ratio can not be expressed in the form \(\frac{a}{b}\) where \(a\) and \(b\) are positive integers. But it does not

explicitlymentions this statementanywhere.Despite all this, this is a nice demonstration of proofs that use the method infinite descent.

Log in to reply

Thanks for the constructive review.Actually I didn't include the golden ration in this note because many people have posted about it before. Here is my note on Stochastic Programming.It will be extremely helpful for me if you write a small review of that note too.....I put a lot of effort into this one but it didn't get attention.Thanks in advance.

Log in to reply

can we say that infinite descent is a strong form of pentagram?

Log in to reply

The symbol is the pentagram and infinite descent is the proof technique....clck on the link if you're interested to learn more about it...

Log in to reply