Relativistic effect of light photons

I recently studied Relativistic effect and I have few doubts. Please clarify

Dual nature of light Dual nature of light

Light has dual nature. So let us now assume that light is a particle and consists of light photons. Now, since light photons are travelling at the speed of light due to DIMENSIONAL CONTRACTION it would be shrank it the size of a POINT with ground frame. Meaning it should have originally been INFINITELY LARGE in size now if it is infinitely large than wouldn't the DRAG FORCE on it be very large. Therefore to overcome drag force shouldn't the photon travel at speeds greater than SPEED OF LIGHT.

AND IS THAT EVEN POSSIBLE ?

DIMENSIONAL CONTRACTION DIMENSIONAL CONTRACTION

Note by Omek K
2 months, 3 weeks ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

my first thought: WHAT THE HECK?! WHAT ARE YOU EVEN SAYING?!
On second thoughts, it's better to talk abot my own opinion about photons:
FACT: photons have no mass. photons are imagined to have no volume, like other basic particles.

from what you're saying, I guess you mean a photon has more than 3 dimensions so it is shrunk to a dot by 'dimensional contraction'. But do photons have more than 3 space dimensions?
second problem:you say how larger size results in larger drag force. it you mean infinitely DENSE or HEAVY, nope! photons have no mass! and if you mean BIGGER, let me assure you: as long as this universe only has 3 dimensions, photon will always remain infinitely small!

one thing I did notice: if photons do have over 3 dimensions and is put in a world of higher dimensions,it may travel faster than light in 3 dimensions.
BUT IN OUR UNIVERSE, I ASSURE YOU, NOT A SINGLE THING GOES FASTER THAN LIGHT, NOT EVEN LIGHT ITSELF!

Jeff Giff - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

I do know that photon doesn't have mass. But consider a pulley system with ideal string. Even though it has no mass, force like TENSION can act on it similarly I am thinking in this case but I don't whether it is applicable ?

Omek K - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

You said that all the basic particles have no volum , does it mean that electrons , protons ,and neutrons all have zero volum . But how is that ?

Ahmed Sami - 2 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

Well, theoretically they have no volume, or at least it is small enough to be ignored, but that doesn’t mean it definitely has no volume. Again, zero volume simply works as a hypothesis for many theories!

Jeff Giff - 2 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

and if dimensional contraction means a twist or wave in spacetime, light travels through it in a bended path.

Jeff Giff - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Dimensional contraction means like if objects are travelling with high velocities then in a stationary frame the object would have shrunk in size wrt stationary observer.

Omek K - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Oh I see :) well if you shrink something with no volume you get no volume don’t you?

Jeff Giff - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

And if you undo it, you get the same, right?

Jeff Giff - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Jeff Giff I guess you are right, well anyway thank you

Omek K - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Omek K You’re welcome :)

Jeff Giff - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Jeff Giff Well since you are online, tell me something about China ^^

Omek K - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Omek K China has area of about 9600000 square kilometres, its population over 1.3 billion (perhaps now over 1.4 billion). The tallest mountain in the world, Mt Everest, lies in the southwest of China.

Jeff Giff - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Jeff Giff Lol, just kidding , don't take it seriously :)

Omek K - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Omek K Too bad I saw this after typing :D

Jeff Giff - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Jeff Giff Never mind anyway XD .

Omek K - 2 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...