Rotation in 3D - The Rotation Matrix

In this note, I investigate the rotation matrix that relates the image of a point p \vec{p} when it is rotated by an angle θ \theta about an axis a \vec{a} that passes through the origin.

Without loss of generality, we assume that the direction vector of the axis is a unit vector.

Now we decompose the vector p \vec{p} , into two components, one along the rotation axis, and one orthogonal to it.

The component along the rotation axis is given by

pa=(p.a)a \vec{p_a} = ( \vec{p} . \vec{a} ) \vec{a}

(remember that a \vec{a} is a unit vector so, aa=1 \vec{a} \cdot \vec{a} = 1

And, the orthogonal component is,

pn=ppa=p(pa)a \vec{p_n} = \vec{p} - \vec{p_a} = \vec{p} - ( \vec{p} \cdot \vec{a} ) \vec{a}

In matrix-vector notation, if all vectors are (3 x 1) column vectors, then

pa=(pa)a=(ap)a=(aTp)a=a(aTp)=(aaT)p \vec{p_a} = (\vec{p} \cdot \vec{a}) \vec{a} = (\vec{a} \cdot \vec{p}) \vec{a} = (\textbf{a}^T \textbf{p}) \textbf{a} = \textbf{a} (\textbf{a}^T \textbf{p}) = (\textbf{a} \textbf{a}^T) \textbf{p}


pn=ppa=(IaaT)p \vec{p_n} = \vec{p} - \vec{p_a} = ( \textbf{I} - \textbf{a} \textbf{a}^T ) \textbf{p}

Now when the component pa \textbf{p}_a undergoes rotation, it is unchanged.

It is pn \textbf{p}_n that gets rotated about the axis a \textbf{a} . To write an expression for the image of pn \textbf{p}_n undergoing a rotation by θ \theta , we need the perpendicular vector to both a \textbf{a} and pn \textbf{p}_n , and is at 90 90 degrees counter-clockwise from pn \textbf{p}_n . This vector is

un=a×pn=a×(ppa)=a×p \vec{u_n} = \vec{a} \times \vec{p_n} = \vec{a} \times (\vec{p} - \vec{p_a}) = \vec{a} \times \vec{p}

because a×pa=0 \vec{a} \times \vec{p_a} = 0 since the two vectors are collinear.

Noe that un=a×pn=pn || \vec{u_n} || = || \vec{a} \times \vec{p_n} || = || \vec{p_n} || because a \vec{a} is orthogonal to pn \vec{p_n} and a \vec{a} is a unit vector.

So now the plane of rotation is spanned by the vectors pn \vec{p_n} and un \vec{u_n} , both equal in length , and that length is pn || \vec{p_n} ||

With that in mind, and since the point describes a circle in the plane of rotation, then

pn=cos(θ)pn+sin(θ)un \vec{p_n} ' = \cos(\theta) \vec{p_n} + \sin(\theta) \vec{u_n}

this expresses the rotation of the normal component of p \vec{p} around the axis a \vec{a} .

Therefore, the rotated vector is

p=pa+pn=pa+cos(θ)pn+sin(θ)un=pa+cos(θ)pn+sin(θ)(a×p) \vec{p} ' = \vec{p_a} + \vec{p_n} ' = \vec{p_a} + \cos(\theta) \vec{p_n} + \sin(\theta) \vec{u_n} = \vec{p_a} + \cos(\theta) \vec{p_n} + \sin(\theta) (\vec{a} \times \vec{p} )

Using the expressions derived above, we arrive at

p=(aaT)p+cos(θ)(IaaT)p+sin(θ)(a×p) \textbf{p} ' = (\textbf{a} \textbf{a}^T) \textbf{p} + \cos(\theta) (\textbf{I} - \textbf{a} \textbf{a}^T) \textbf{p} + \sin(\theta) (\textbf{a} \times \textbf{p})


a×p=Sap \textbf{a} \times \textbf{p} = \textbf{S}_a \textbf{p}

where Sa \textbf{S}_a is a 3 x 3 skew-symmetric matrix given by

Sa=[0azayaz0axayax0] \textbf{S}_a = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -a_z & a_y \\ a_z & 0 & -a_x \\ -a_y & a_x & 0 \end{bmatrix}

(that is, the vector cross product a×p \textbf{a} \times \textbf{p} , can be expressed as a matrix-vector multiplication)

and hence, finally,

p=Rp \textbf{p}' = \textbf{R} \textbf{p}


R=aaT+cos(θ)(IaaT)+sin(θ)Sa \textbf {R} = \textbf{a} \textbf{a}^T + \cos(\theta) ( I - \textbf{a} \textbf{a}^T ) + \sin(\theta) \textbf{S}_a

is the desired rotation matrix.

What if the axis of rotation did not pass through the origin, but passed though a point p0=[x0,y0,z0] \textbf{p}_0 = [x_0, y_0, z_0] ?

In this case, we can translate (shift) the origin of the reference frame to the point p0 \textbf{p}_0 . Since p0 \textbf{p}_0 is on the axis of rotation it is unaffected by the rotation, and its image is itself. Then, we apply our result to the vector (pp0) (\textbf{p} - \textbf{p}_0) which joins the axis of rotation at the point p0 \textbf{p}_0 .


p=p0+R(pp0) \textbf{p} ' = \textbf{p}_0 + \textbf{R} ( \textbf{p} - \textbf{p}_0)

Note by Hosam Hajjir
6 years, 8 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link]( link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}


Sort by:

Top Newest

nice work! you have solved something which is easy to imagine hard to solve but i didn't get the matrix step how did you use the transpose part. i am a novice at linear algebra so please explain in little simpler terms

Srivats Anshumaali - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

I am sorry, I cannot make it any simpler. I suggest you wait till you've gained a working experience with Linear Algebra, then revisit this note, but thanks for the complement.

Hosam Hajjir - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply


Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...