By your response I thought what you have thought about me. So
I request you not to judge me on my age coz I m still 14 although it is showing 22.
I do hope there will not be any clashes in b/w us in the future.
I m also sorry for being rude to you and I too hope you feeling the same way.

Oh, I was being literal because you asked for a positive response :)

No worries. On Brilliant, because the problems are much harder than what one would normally encounter, it is very common for mistakes / misconceptions to occur. The important thing is to learn from the mistakes and understand why you had made them, and how to avoid them in future.

No one is exempt from making mistakes, me included. I have had posted numerous problems where I got corrected by the community. For example, I had a problem in which I made numerous mistakes which let to all kinds of wrong conclusions. @brian charlesworth came along and helped me fix the problem, which led to this gem.

In fact, I do not know of any avid problem creator who has not had at least one valid report submitted against his problem. Eventually, they get fixed, and the community appreciates their efforts.

Oh Skanda , I happened to see this problem click here. The answer to this problem is wrong , infact Jon Hausmann has given proof to prove it false. I saw that you are one of its solvers.I am very curious to know its method. Can you explain to me how you arrived at this answer? That would be helpful .. thanks!

Since its too easy for you , it may be easy for you to post a solution or explain your approach.Kindly post a solution here or at the question itself. @Calvin Lin his solution may help us. Thanks!

@Skanda Prasad
–
Also , there is a possibility that you may have deleted your own comment and pretending as if someone deleted it.And you are making this fact as a reason to not give a solution , because you indeed cannot give a solution... Nice method of fooling someone.

@Calvin Lin
–
Sir , this clearly indicates that Skanda Prasad is a fake person , 'a cheater'. And to hide his mistakes , he puts blame on others eg: Calvin Sir to hide his mistakes!

@Skanda Prasad
–
My records indicate that there was only 1 comment (deleted by Skanda) posted between Nihar's 2 initial comments above (see screenshot below). It is possible that Skanda thought the comment was posted, but for whatever reason, it was not. This should be the end of the discussion (about deleted comments).

In any case, I would appreciate if Skanda can post a solution to that problem.

@Calvin Lin
–
Sir , I am damn sure that he would not be able to post a solution , because he didn't solve it , he obtained the answer by cheating. Also , he could have realized that the problem has faults , and he might have written a report , if in indeed he had solved that problem.

@Nihar Mahajan
–
You already know that I am not able to report any problem... There is something wrong with my system, or the internet or with brilliant.

@Skanda Prasad
–
This is also a lie.... Even if you are convincing us that you cannot report a problem , you might have posted in calvins message board about the flaw of that question like you did for @Pi Han Goh 's problem of \(\pi\) (pi).But you did not do even that which means , you are lying again.

@Nihar Mahajan
–
For your kindest information, I have already posted that and I have also told that I do not know how to click a screenshot so that Calvin could troubleshoot it.

@Nihar Mahajan
–
I am not sitting on BRILLIANT to convince people like yourselves, I you want to believe me, then well and good, and if not then you have made your choice...

@Skanda Prasad
–
How can I believe you? @Calvin Lin 's records clearly indicate that you are a 'cheater' and a 'lier'. Also you cannot provide solution to a problem which you solved 'too easily'. which means you did't solve that problem by yourselves and you got the answer by cheating!

@Skanda Prasad
–
But how can you solve a 'wrong' question? That question is geometrically wrong and there is a proof which proves it wrong. Do you deserve points for a wrong answer of a wrong problem?

@Skanda Prasad
–
The uppermost grade is 'A' in our school. There is no system of 'A1 or A+' in our school. Well don't estimate one's intellect by his school grades because school grades tell us the memory of a child and not the understanding.

@Skanda Prasad
–
If you want to convince yourself , come to my school and ask the school staff. You will get answer answer as 'A'. You are a liar and a cheater, don't put blame on others.

@Skanda Prasad
–
Calvin has given the proof that you are utterfoolish, cheater , liar.And there is no need to come there , since Calvin has already proved you are lying. Better shut your untruthful mouth , you are a hazard for the brilliant community.

Don't we say this everyday?
Let us learn to believe our brothers and sisters.
Believe in me as I do in you.

Fine, I am sorry for what I said and I shouldn't have been so rude.
People are sometimes a bit titchy, we must understand their situation and forgive them.

@Skanda Prasad
–
You are saying 'Don't believe the truth' So you believe in 'lie things and rumours'? I think you will never succeed in life with such bad thinking. You are still to be taught basic moral values...

Skanda Prasad please follow the guide lines below to write a link.

1) Firstly open the square brackets i.e, [ . . . ]

2) Next, write something in it. example [here]

3) Next go to the page where you want to connect this link. For example if you want to connect the link to you Sound problem, go to that page

4) Next, copy the URL written on the page. For example, in this page the URL can be found above(i.e, https://brilliant.org/discussions/thread/skanda-prasads-message-board/).

5) Now, open curved brackets i.e, ( . . . )(i.e, [here] and beside it, without space( . . . ))

6) Finally copy the URL in to the curved brackets and click post or preview to see it in GREENS! For example, I've made a link to your Sound-2 problem, click here

With reference to your problem and problem, here is the proof that in any cyclic hexagon, \( \angle A + \angle C + \angle E = 360 ^ \circ \). It is independent of BDF being an equilateral triangle, which is not stated in the question, and cannot be used as an assumption in the problem.

Solution: Say the (not necessarily regular) hexagon is ABCDEF. Then, \( \angle A = 180 ^ \circ - \angle FDB \), \( \angle C = 180 ^ \circ - \angle BFD \), \( \angle E = 180 ^ \circ - \angle FDB \).

I do not abuse the power of being staff. Note that Jon Haussmann's dispute echoes mine. I have stated out the reasons for why your problem was deleted. Specifically, the 2 issues are:

In your question you did not state that \(DEF\) is an equilateral triangle, as such that cannot be used in the solution. It is an unwarranted assumption, and hence a solution of "Let's assume this fact" is not a correct solution.

There are multiple ways to prove a fact. It is not reasonable to use MCQ to say "You can only prove this problem in this certain way". For example, I could have used a lot of parallel lines to show that the sum of those angles is 180, instead of using triangle \(BFD \).

As such, the answer of "By construction proving triangle is equilateral and then by cyclic quadilateral property" is not correct because it is a false statement.

I am 100 % sure that it is accurate question and with a valid answer.
As you would have noticed, I have posted my solution.
If you prove that it is wrong, I will also stop posting this question again and again.

If you do not know to solve in this way then please see the solution given below.

By construction, OB=OD=OF.

If you use a little of your brains, you might understand that BDF is now an equilateral triangle,
by the isosceles triangle property of triangles OFD, OBD and OBF.

Hence all angles are equal in the triangle BDF as OB, OF, OD are the radii of the circle.

Now consider the quadrilateral DBAF, As angle B = 60 degrees, angle A = 120 degrees.

In the same way, it can be proved for the angles, C and E

Are you claiming that if \( OB = OD = OF \) then \( BDF \) must be an equilateral triangle? This would imply that any 3 points on a circle always form an equilateral triangle.

@Calvin Lin
–
If you have any confusion with the fig. then pls check my problem known as " Geometrically Brain teasing Problem by Skanda Prasad" where you will get the fig. and clear the confusions, if you had had any....
Thank You Sir !!!!

@Skanda Prasad
–
I have seen the figure. It has not implied that BDF is an equilateral triangle.

Unless, the figure is trying to say that Angles A , C ,E are equal, in which case that should be clearly stated in the problem. And if so, then ABCDEF is a regular hexagon, and so there are 2 possible answers to your problem.

@Calvin Lin
–
You have asked me for the proof and I have given it to you.
Consider the quadrilateral DBAF after proving BDF is an equilateral traingle.
as angle BDF = 60 degrees, angle BAF = 120 degrees

Consider the quadrilateral DBFE,
as angle DBF = 60 degrees, angle DEF = 120 degrees

Consider the quadrilateral DCBF
as angle DFB = 60 degrees, angle DCB = 120 degrees

@Calvin Lin
–
Sir its 12:00 am in the night, my parents are asking me to sleep now and could we please continue our conversation at round 15 hrs later, it would be afternoon here by then........

@Skanda Prasad
–
B, D, F are points on the circumference, so OB, OD, OF are all radii of the circle. So yes, OD is a radii. It is just not drawn in as yet.

@Calvin Lin
–
I was just surfing in your message board.
You had changed a person's age.....
Is it possible for mine too, Sir??
Could you please change it as 14 from 22 ??

@Calvin Lin
–
Did you understand another concept of isosceles triangle property?? Sir??
Consider triangle OBD
OB=OD
hence angle OBD=ODB

Consider traingle ODF
OD=OF
Hence angle ODF=OFD

But angle ODB=ODF
and angle ODB+ODF= angle BDF

In the same way we can take the triangles OBF
OB=OF
Hence angle OBF=OFB

angle OFD+OFB=angle DFB

HENCE angles BDF = BFD =
DBF (in the same way)
AS ALL ANGLES IN A TRIANGLE ARE EQUAL, THEIR SIDES ARE EQUAL AND HENCEFORTH CONSIDERED TO BE AN EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE.

Come on!! you must know that the equal radius bring equal base angles.

Hence, angle ODB in the triangle OBD and angle ODF in triangle OFD have the same measures.

in the same way, if you add angles OFD and OFB you will get Angle DFB
if you add angles OBF and OBD you will get angle DBF
when all the angles in a triangle are equal, it is an equilateral triangle

IT IS TRUE FOR ALL SUCH ANGLES IN THE FIG. HENCE IT IS AN EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE.

I do not agree that angle ODB = OFD, unless there is some other reason which you have not stated. What does "equal radius bring equal base angles" mean?

Consider the following diagram. OB, OD, OF are radii of the circle marked in red. Is BDF an equilateral triangle (marked in blue)?

@Calvin Lin
–
Sir pls donot make and post meaningless figures, just talk about mine.
there was a hexagon in which the triangle is enclosed.

I m completely sure that my solution was correct and "meaningful"
I donot wish continue this arguement, or whatever you might call it.....

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CO-OPERATION AND SUGGESTION,
YOU ARE VERY BRAINY, INTELLIGENT, AND I AM AN ILLITERATE FELLOW WHO DOES'NT KNOWS TO READ............ HAPPY ??
PLEASE LEAVE ME ALONE AND I DO NOT EXPECT ANY MORE COMMENTS ON THE PROBLEMS I POST.
PLEASE STOP DELETING PROBLEMS WHICH "YOU" DONOT LIKE,
PEOPLE MIGHT HAVE POSTED WITH A MEANING ONLY AND NOT JUST FOR FUN.........

I dont give a damn about Jon Houseman or whoever he is... that is very unessential for me....

THANK YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@Sravanth Chebrolu
–
Oh! This one! I tried to solve it long ago.....
But unfortunately I got it wrong.... Ha Ha !! Never mind.......
I thought that in 2 and a 1/2 hours, there are two COMPLETE hours so I clicked '2'.

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewest+

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin , where did Skanda's account go?

Log in to reply

It got deleted by Skanda i.e. me

Log in to reply

By your response I thought what you have thought about me. So I request you not to judge me on my age coz I m still 14 although it is showing 22. I do hope there will not be any clashes in b/w us in the future. I m also sorry for being rude to you and I too hope you feeling the same way.

Log in to reply

Oh, I was being literal because you asked for a positive response :)

No worries. On Brilliant, because the problems are much harder than what one would normally encounter, it is very common for mistakes / misconceptions to occur. The important thing is to learn from the mistakes and understand why you had made them, and how to avoid them in future.

No one is exempt from making mistakes, me included. I have had posted numerous problems where I got corrected by the community. For example, I had a problem in which I made numerous mistakes which let to all kinds of wrong conclusions. @brian charlesworth came along and helped me fix the problem, which led to this gem.

In fact, I do not know of any avid problem creator who has not had at least one valid report submitted against his problem. Eventually, they get fixed, and the community appreciates their efforts.

Log in to reply

Good!

Log in to reply

You've given the literal response sir, +++.

Log in to reply

click here for more information on LATEX

Log in to reply

Oh Skanda , I happened to see this problem click here. The answer to this problem is wrong , infact Jon Hausmann has given proof to prove it false. I saw that you are one of its solvers.I am very curious to know its method. Can you explain to me how you arrived at this answer? That would be helpful .. thanks!

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Apr 10, 2015

Log in to reply

Since its too easy for you , it may be easy for you to post a solution or explain your approach.Kindly post a solution here or at the question itself. @Calvin Lin his solution may help us. Thanks!

Log in to reply

Since it is deleted, I am not going to give any solution...

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Given his comment, if it was done in error, let me know and I can undelete it.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

In any case, I would appreciate if Skanda can post a solution to that problem.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh 's problem of \(\pi\) (pi).But you did not do even that which means , you are lying again.

This is also a lie.... Even if you are convincing us that you cannot report a problem , you might have posted in calvins message board about the flaw of that question like you did forLog in to reply

Use your eyes and your brains

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin 's records clearly indicate that you are a 'cheater' and a 'lier'. Also you cannot provide solution to a problem which you solved 'too easily'. which means you did't solve that problem by yourselves and you got the answer by cheating!

How can I believe you?Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Still, do you dare answering my question??

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Don't we say this everyday? Let us learn to believe our brothers and sisters. Believe in me as I do in you.

Fine, I am sorry for what I said and I shouldn't have been so rude. People are sometimes a bit titchy, we must understand their situation and forgive them.

Here's a simple math

2get and 2give is not easy,

So just double it!

4get and 4give...

Thanks! for the suggestions... See ya!

Log in to reply

I am a person who solves questions and later in the night, I get up thinking how are the diff. ways of solving a problem

Something in my heart told me that the answer is 4 for that question.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Hello every one!! Why don't you try this out??

Log in to reply

Skanda Prasad please follow the guide lines below to write a link.

1) Firstly open the square brackets i.e, [ . . . ]

2) Next, write something in it. example [here]

3) Next go to the page where you want to connect this link. For example if you want to connect the link to you Sound problem, go to that page

4) Next, copy the URL written on the page. For example, in this page the URL can be found above(i.e, https://brilliant.org/discussions/thread/skanda-prasads-message-board/).

5) Now, open curved brackets i.e, ( . . . )(i.e, [here] and beside it, without space( . . . ))

6) Finally copy the URL in to the curved brackets and click post or preview to see it in

GREENS!For example, I've made a link to your Sound-2 problem, click hereLog in to reply

With reference to your problem and problem, here is the proof that in

anycyclic hexagon, \( \angle A + \angle C + \angle E = 360 ^ \circ \). It is independent of BDF being an equilateral triangle, which is not stated in the question, and cannot be used as an assumption in the problem.Solution:Say the (not necessarily regular) hexagon is ABCDEF. Then, \( \angle A = 180 ^ \circ - \angle FDB \), \( \angle C = 180 ^ \circ - \angle BFD \), \( \angle E = 180 ^ \circ - \angle FDB \).Hence, \( \angle A + \angle C + \angle E = 540 ^ \circ - ( \angle FDB - \angle BFD - \angle FDB ) = 540 ^ \circ - 180 ^ \circ = 360 ^ \circ \).

I do not abuse the power of being staff. Note that Jon Haussmann's dispute echoes mine. I have stated out the reasons for why your problem was deleted. Specifically, the 2 issues are:

In your question you did not state that \(DEF\) is an equilateral triangle, as such that cannot be used in the solution. It is an unwarranted assumption, and hence a solution of "Let's assume this fact" is not a correct solution.

There are multiple ways to prove a fact. It is not reasonable to use MCQ to say "You can only prove this problem in this certain way". For example, I could have used a lot of parallel lines to show that the sum of those angles is 180, instead of using triangle \(BFD \).

As such, the answer of "By construction proving triangle is equilateral and then by cyclic quadilateral property" is not correct because it is a false statement.

Log in to reply

I am 100 % sure that it is accurate question and with a valid answer. As you would have noticed, I have posted my solution. If you prove that it is wrong, I will also stop posting this question again and again.

Log in to reply

If you do not know to solve in this way then please see the solution given below.

By construction, OB=OD=OF.

If you use a little of your brains, you might understand that BDF is now an equilateral triangle, by the isosceles triangle property of triangles OFD, OBD and OBF.

Hence all angles are equal in the triangle BDF as OB, OF, OD are the radii of the circle.

Now consider the quadrilateral DBAF, As angle B = 60 degrees, angle A = 120 degrees.

In the same way, it can be proved for the angles, C and E

Log in to reply

Are you claiming that if \( OB = OD = OF \) then \( BDF \) must be an equilateral triangle? This would imply that any 3 points on a circle always form an equilateral triangle.

Can you explain the following diagram them?

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Unless, the figure is trying to say that Angles A , C ,E are equal, in which case that should be clearly stated in the problem. And if so, then ABCDEF is a regular hexagon, and so there are 2 possible answers to your problem.

Log in to reply

Consider the quadrilateral DBFE, as angle DBF = 60 degrees, angle DEF = 120 degrees

Consider the quadrilateral DCBF as angle DFB = 60 degrees, angle DCB = 120 degrees

Hence Angles A + C + E = 120+120+120 = 360

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

thank you for your co-operation........

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Hence they are equal. Simple!! Isn't it Sir??

And also note that O is the centre of the circle. therefore radii are the same in the circle....!!!!!!

I have no pleasure in explaining the diagram because it is not the one related to my problem

Log in to reply

Yes, OB = OD = OF as length. In the diagram, I have given you points O, B, D, F such that OB = OD = OF. But BDF is not an equilateral triangle.

Note that even though OB= OD = OF, this does not imply that BD = DF = FB, which is necessary to show that it is an equilateral triangle.

Log in to reply

Consider traingle ODF OD=OF Hence angle ODF=OFD

But angle ODB=ODF and angle ODB+ODF= angle BDF

In the same way we can take the triangles OBF OB=OF Hence angle OBF=OFB

angle OFD+OFB=angle DFB

HENCE angles BDF = BFD = DBF (in the same way) AS ALL ANGLES IN A TRIANGLE ARE EQUAL, THEIR SIDES ARE EQUAL AND HENCEFORTH CONSIDERED TO BE AN EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Here's the proof...

Consider the triangle ODB in which angle ODB=OBD

Consider triangle ODF angle OFD=ODF

Come on!! you must know that the equal radius bring equal base angles.

Hence, angle ODB in the triangle OBD and angle ODF in triangle OFD have the same measures.

in the same way, if you add angles OFD and OFB you will get Angle DFB if you add angles OBF and OBD you will get angle DBF when all the angles in a triangle are equal, it is an equilateral triangle

IT IS TRUE FOR ALL SUCH ANGLES IN THE FIG. HENCE IT IS AN EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

I m completely sure that my solution was correct and "meaningful" I donot wish continue this arguement, or whatever you might call it.....

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CO-OPERATION AND SUGGESTION, YOU ARE VERY BRAINY, INTELLIGENT, AND I AM AN ILLITERATE FELLOW WHO DOES'NT KNOWS TO READ............ HAPPY ?? PLEASE LEAVE ME ALONE AND I DO NOT EXPECT ANY MORE COMMENTS ON THE PROBLEMS I POST. PLEASE STOP DELETING PROBLEMS WHICH "YOU" DONOT LIKE, PEOPLE MIGHT HAVE POSTED WITH A MEANING ONLY AND NOT JUST FOR FUN.........

I dont give a damn about Jon Houseman or whoever he is... that is very unessential for me....

THANK YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Log in to reply

troll king contest by clicking here

Before talking about your previous comment, check out my question for theLog in to reply

Log in to reply

troll king contest by posting an April-fool-ish queston???

Well then, but why don't you join theLog in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

this, which has now been deleted.

They were talking aboutLog in to reply