Today, my friend asked me when to use trig sub in integration. Sarcastically, I said, "always" to which he replied, "Really? What about when you integrate x." So I thought for a second and this is what resulted.

\(\displaystyle\int x~dx\)

\(x=\sin(u)\)

\(dx=\cos(u)~du\)

\(\displaystyle\int \cos(u)\sin(u)~du=\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int \sin(2u)~du\)

\(w=2u\)

\(\frac{1}{4}\displaystyle\int \sin(w) ~dw=-\frac{1}{4} \cos(2u)=-\frac{1}{4}(1-2\sin^2(u))\)

\(-\frac{1}{4}(1-2x^2)=-\frac{1}{4}+\frac{x^2}{2}+c\)

Which, because of the constant of integration, is equivalent to \(\frac{x^2}{2}+c\)

Moral of the story: always use trig sub.

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestIntegration of 1 will have more profound effect.

Log in to reply

Would it change how you integrated it at all?

Log in to reply

\( \int \sin^2 x + \cos^2x \, dx \).

Log in to reply

But if you put sin u =x then the x can only take values from -1 to 1

Log in to reply

This works for integrals like \(\displaystyle\int \sin(x) \, dx\) as well.

Log in to reply

Hey Trevor! How's it goin'? Are you swamped with homework already? And yeah, trig sub is my fave too :)

Log in to reply

Hey Brian :) Glad to "see" you again. Yes, I'm overflowed with work from school. The main reason I haven't been posting much recently is because I haven't been able to think of many good problems. I'm still solving problems occasionally but there just haven't been many inspirations.

I have around 10 problems just sitting on my phone that I don't wanna post simply because they're not good enough. I guess it's because my problem posting standards have gotten much higher as last year I would have posted them without hesitation. I'll be posting a somewhat useful integration identity soon once I finish all my work that I have to make up from being sick.

Log in to reply

Sorry to hear that you've been sick. :( Catching up can be tough; it always seems to take twice as long to cover the same amount of material. As for posting problems, I basically took the summer off, (although I kept posting solutions now and then), and only posted my first question in two months a few days ago. I'm having issues with inspiration and standards too, but I'm hoping that just getting a few more posted will "prime the pump" and get me back into the flow of things. For you, school takes precedence, as it should, and I assume that any spare time you have for Brilliant gets devoted to your responsibilities as a moderator and collaborator. Anyway, to cheer you up I thought I'd create a problem in your honor. Enjoy. :)

Log in to reply

Bad news: the note on the integration thingy I was gonna post has been delayed.

Good news: while I was posting it, I found a more general form of the integral and another case that works so I'll have to delay posting the note until I fully figure out this new case.

Log in to reply

I'm continuing to look forward to your next posting; I'm sure that it will be worth the wait. Hope that you've fully recovered from your illness and have caught up with all your coursework. :)

P.S.. How about that Jason Day?!?! He's in another league right now. Fun to watch, and he seems to be such a great guy and role model. I think we may be entering another 'golden age' of men's professional golf with all these young, exceptional players.

Log in to reply

The integral note I'm going to post has to do with integrals of the form \(\dfrac{1}{x^a \prod (x^b+k)^c}\) and a trick that you can use to get rid of 1, or sometimes (but rarely) more terms in the denominator. You can always get rid of the \(x^a\) assuming the the powers in the denominator fit a certain case. If the powers don't fit a the case, then the integral will have logs in its final form. However, I had to delay it because I found another case and I'm working with when a or c are negative (the negative case of a and c will probably be posted in a separate note cuz it changes A LOT).

The 59 was amazing! I unfortunately wasn't watching it but I saw the highlights video (it was practically all 59 shots). Golf is heading towards another surge in popularity, maybe not quite a golden age but with all the young phenoms coming in who knows?

Log in to reply

Can help on this question ? : https://brilliant.org/discussions/thread/extremely-weird-integration/?ref_id=946409

Log in to reply

You wrote -1/4(cos2u)=1/4(1-2sin^2u) It should be -1/4(cos2u)=-1/4(1-2sin^2u)

Log in to reply