Hello there,

Maybe the first thing that a calculus student when studying the sine and cosine function is that these are the first that he knows and do not have a limit as \(x\to +\infty\).

But how about the sequence \((\sin n)\) and \((\cos n)\) ? do they have a limit ?

A method to prove that \((\sin n)\) does not have a limit is as follow :

Assume that it has a limit then it should be a real number \(l\) since \(\sin\) is bounded.

Since \(\sin n\to l\), we get \(\sin(2n) \to l\) and : \(\cos(2n) \to 1-2l^2\).

we have : \[\sin 2 = \sin(2n+2-2n) =\sin(2n+2)\cos(2n) -\sin(2n)\cos(2n+2).\]

But the limit of the right side is : \( l(1-2l^2) -l(1-2l^2) =0.\)

Which means that \(\sin 2=0\) which is absurd.

If you liked it, share it. If you have question just write them.

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestIn any interval of the form \( [k\pi +\frac{\pi}{3},k\pi +\frac{2\pi}{3}]\), where \(k \) is any natural number, there is at least a natural number \(n_{k}\). The reason is that any such interval has length \(\pi/3\) that is greater than 1. Since those intervals are mutually disjoint then the sequence \(\{n_{k}\}\) is a sub-sequence of the sequence \(\{n\}\) and, obviously, \(|\sin n_k|\geq \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\). In a similar way, considering the intervals of the form \([k\pi -\frac{\pi}{6},k\pi +\frac{\pi}{6}]\), we can construct another sub-sequence \(\{m_k\},\) of the sequence \(\{n\},\) such that \(|\sin m_k|\leq \frac{1}{2}.\) Assume that \(\lim_{n\to \infty}\sin{n}\) exists and is the number \(l.\) Using both sub-sequences defined above, we obtain that \(|l|\geq \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\) and \(|l|\leq \frac{1}{2}\), and this is a contradiction.

Log in to reply

Hi Haroun! Nice solution. One thing though, you are assuming that the limit of \(sin(n)\) exists, for that the sequence \(sin(n)\) needs to be monotonic and bounded. Obviously \(sin(n)\) is bounded but what about monotonicity? It behaves differently( i.e. increasing/decreasing) in different intervals.

Log in to reply

A convergent sequence does not have to be monotonic, for example \(\frac{(-1)^n}{n}\).

If a sequence is bounded and monotonic then it converges (this an implication not an equivalence).

Log in to reply

Obviously because there is not a set definition for the limit any oscillating series/function.

Log in to reply

May I ask what math class you are in.

Log in to reply

Haha, I'm in Algebra 1. I'm SUPPOSED to be in pre-calc or above, but my school-system is stupid. :D

Log in to reply

A much easier way to see that \(sin(n)\) can't possibly have a limit is to note that since \( sin(x) \) doesn't have a limit and is continuous, it can't possibly be that the limit at integral values exists. (I'll leave it to the interested reader to prove this rigorously.)

Log in to reply

How you got sin2n tends to l ??

Log in to reply

If a sequence \(a_n\) converge to some real \(l\) then all of it subsequences converge to \(l\) this follows from the limit definition.

Log in to reply

but how are you taking sin2n = l because as you are taking cos2n = 1 -2* l^2. can't we take sin2n=2

sin(n)cos(n). and hence sin2n= 2l(sqrt(1-l^2))?Log in to reply