This kinda special limit

Let PaP_a and PbP_b be 2 polynomials with same degree, n, and same leading coefficient c, with c0c\neq 0 (otherwise the degree is less than n):



Let y=limx(Pa(x)nPb(x)n)y=\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\Big(\sqrt[n]{P_a(x)}-\sqrt[n]{P_b(x)}\Big). In this note I try to find the value of yy.

Let La(x)=i=0n2aixiL_a(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{n-2}a_ix^i, and Lb(x)=i=0n2bixiL_b(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{n-2}b_ix^i. Later, we'll see that both the value of La(x)L_a(x) and Lb(x)L_b(x) won't affect the value of the limit. We have:





Since deg(Pa)=deg(Pb)=n\deg(P_a)=\deg(P_b)=n and both have leading coefficient c, then:




and we're done. We've found the value of yy. Take quite long, around 1 hour.

Note by Gian Sanjaya
5 years, 8 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link]( link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}


Sort by:

Top Newest

You should state what you are trying to achieve at the start, so that others can understand what you are trying to say.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh okay, thanks for the suggestion. I'll edit it.

Gian Sanjaya - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. This clarifies the result :)

What happens if degPa=n\deg P_a = n and degPb=m \deg P_b = m ? What would be the conditions under which limPanPbm \lim \sqrt[n]{P_a} - \sqrt[m]{P_b} is a constant? And under these conditions, what is the constant equal to?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Let the leading coefficient of PaP_a and PbP_b be zaz_a and zbz_b, respectively. I would consider separating the root of polynomials in the limit to get:

limx(Pa(x)nPb(x)m)=limx(Pa(x)nzanx)limx(Pb(x)mzbmx)+limx(zanzbm)x\displaystyle \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \Big(\sqrt[n]{P_a(x)} - \sqrt[m]{P_b(x)}\Big)=\displaystyle \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \Big(\sqrt[n]{P_a(x)} - \sqrt[n]{z_a}x\Big) - \displaystyle \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \Big(\sqrt[m]{P_b(x)} - \sqrt[m]{z_b}x\Big) + \displaystyle \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \Big(\sqrt[n]{z_a} - \sqrt[m]{z_b}\Big)x

Applying what I've found, we would see that the first 2 limits are finite; the whole limit will be constant, not approaching either sides of infinity, if and only if the last limit is constant, which happens if and only if zanzbm=0\sqrt[n]{z_a}-\sqrt[m]{z_b}=0, or equivalently zan=zbm\sqrt[n]{z_a}=\sqrt[m]{z_b}. Now, let za=cnz_a = c^n and zb=cmz_b=c^m for a positive real number c (so it holds for all values of m and n), and let PaP_a and PbP_b be defined as:

Pa(x)=cnxn+an1xn1+i=0n2aixiP_a(x)=c^n x^n + a_{n-1} x^{n-1} + \displaystyle \sum_{i=0}^{n-2} a_i x^i

Pb(x)=cmxm+bm1xm1+i=0m2bixiP_b(x)=c^m x^m + b_{m-1} x^{m-1} + \displaystyle \sum_{i=0}^{m-2} b_i x^i

We now have:

limx(Pa(x)nPb(x)m)=an1ncn1bm1mcm1\displaystyle \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \Big(\sqrt[n]{P_a(x)} - \sqrt[m]{P_b(x)}\Big)=\frac{a_{n-1}}{nc^{n-1}}-\frac{b_{m-1}}{mc^{m-1}}

Gian Sanjaya - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Gian Sanjaya That's a good analysis.

1. Your end result disagrees with the previous result.
2. When you split out a limit (LHS) into 2 or more parts (RHS), it is not true that the LHS exists if and only if the RHS exists. If the RHS exists, then the LHS exists. But it is possible for the LHS to exist, while the RHS does not exist. Case in point:
lim0limx+lim(x). \lim 0 \neq \lim x + \lim (-x).
3. I suggest doing something similar to what you did. Consider (anmbnm)=(ab)× ( a^{nm} - b^{nm}) = (a-b) \times stuff.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply


Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...