Let A be an invertible matrix. Show that there exists a unique differentiable function f such that det(f(A))=f(tr(A)).
Solution
If A is invertible, then there exists some diagonal matrix D and similar matrix P such that
A=PDP−1.
det(f(A))=det(Pf(D)P−1)
det(f(A))=det(P)det(f(D))det(P−1)
det(f(A))=det(PP−1)det(f(D))
det(f(A))=det(f(D))
Since the diagonal matrix is composed of eigenvalues along its main diagonal,
det(f(A))=i=1∏nf(λi).
There are two important properties of square matrices: for some square matrix M, the sum of its eigenvalues equals its trace; the product of its eigenvalues equals its determinant [Proof].
Hence, we need to find a function such that i=1∏nf(λi)=f(i=1∑nλi).
Only the exponential function satisfies this criteria.
Therefore,
det(exp(A))=exp(tr(A)).
Check out my other notes at Proof, Disproof, and Derivation
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Sort by:
Top NewestWhoa whoa whoa. You have a function f acting on a matrix and then use the same f to act on a number. Also, what are the outputs on f?
You jumped way too many steps: how does f(A)=Pf(D)P−1??? You will need to justify how f(PDP−1) ends up being what you say it is... everything past that calculation is a blur to anyone who is going to read it.
One final note: you will need to justify why the exponential function is the ONLY function that satisfies this property. One one hand, you want existence of the function, but in the title you say this is unique. Which one?
Log in to reply
The question does not make sense. What are the domains and ranges of f ? From the left hand side it appears that both the domain and range are space of square matrices. On the other hand from the right hand side it appears that the domain and range are sets of real numbers !
Log in to reply
I second this comment. The definition of f is not clear by what is written; OP would really need to reconsider the definitions...
Log in to reply
You have to be careful about these operations. The determinant of a square matrix (with real number entries) is a real number. The trace of a square matrix(with real number entries) is a real number. So on both sides, there are two mappings. LHS f:M->M then det:M->R. RHS trace:M->R then f:R->R. Both are ultimately mappings from square matrices to reals, but the journey there is different.
Log in to reply
I just thought about it on a walk today. I think I will change the question and actually prove the only function that is valid for this identity. Stay tuned to see it.
Log in to reply