# What does the complex root affect the polynomial? (help mehhh!)

Polynomials with degree $n$ always have $n$ roots, no matter if it's real, complex, or multiple roots.

Obviously, the real roots represent the intersection of x-axis.

But how about complex roots?! Does it say anything about the graph or not? If yes, can we know anything about it? Thank you! ^_^ Note by Samuraiwarm Tsunayoshi
4 years, 10 months ago

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

• Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
• Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
• Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold
- bulleted- list
• bulleted
• list
1. numbered2. list
1. numbered
2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in $$ ... $$ or $ ... $ to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 $2 \times 3$
2^{34} $2^{34}$
a_{i-1} $a_{i-1}$
\frac{2}{3} $\frac{2}{3}$
\sqrt{2} $\sqrt{2}$
\sum_{i=1}^3 $\sum_{i=1}^3$
\sin \theta $\sin \theta$
\boxed{123} $\boxed{123}$

Sort by:

You could probably think of a polynomial $f: \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ as a mapping from $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ to $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ (since $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ and $\mathbb{C}$ can be taken to be equivalent). If $(z, w) = f(x, y)$, then the zeroes are then $f$'s intersections with the plane $(z, w) = (0, 0)$.

Since this can be hard to visualise, you could perhaps also graph $|f(x, y)|$ in 3D. The zeroes would then of course intersect the plane $|f(x, y)| = 0$. Since $|f(x, y)|$ is always nonnegative, the zeroes are then also the global minima of the function. Probably.

I might just be spouting nonsense though.

Also, while $f$ always has $\deg(f)$ complex roots, without counting for multiplicity you have your good old Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.

- 4 years, 10 months ago

What if we think about simple xy-plane, does this still work?

- 4 years, 10 months ago

Take $y = x^{2}+1$, which has roots $\pm i$; you can see that the parabola doesn't intersect the x-axis, but all that tells you is that its roots are nonreal. Maybe the focus and directrix might tell you a bit more, but I doubt it.

If you have a polynomial $f$ with even $\deg(f)$ of constant term 0, it passes through the origin. If you compare it with a congruent graph translated in the ±ve y direction with no real roots, you can deduce that the product of the roots is ±ve if the graph is "smiling" and ∓ve if the graph is "frowning", even if all the roots are nonreal.

- 4 years, 9 months ago

f (x) = 0 is the thing you mentioned.

f (z) = f (x + j y) = F (x)+ j G (y) = 0 is for complex numbers.

When we say Z = 0, we mean F (x) + j G (y) = 0. It is an x y- plan of both F (x) = 0 and G (y) = 0.

With Taylor's expansion, we are able to solve a polynomial equation with complex coefficients for all roots. There are n roots for polynomial of power n. This method allows a 1-dimensional search for 2-dimensional complex roots. Without which a two dimensional search for complex roots is tedious; I would say it as incorrect approach.

I invented a theorem which can obtain all roots for n-polynomial equations with complex coefficients. Theoretically, there is no limit to n allowed. I attempted up to z^10 + .... = 0 for real coefficients and up to z^5 + ... = 0 for complex coefficients. n roots for n power polynomial equations is true. However, I only completed in hands with z^8 + ... = 0 and z^4 + ... = 0 respectively. No intermediate term or coefficient is missing and they are very general.

Tell you an interesting thing. For cubic x^3 + p x^2 + q x + r = 0 of complex coefficients, cubic formula shall give all the roots, provided proper combination of two surds times omega are chosen correctly for each case. Hard to tell unless you study and investigate your own. Have a pleasant trial!

- 4 years, 9 months ago

well if z axis is thought as imaginary axis!!how about that!!!u should get a 3 d shape

- 4 years, 9 months ago

Good!

- 4 years, 9 months ago

What do you mean? Every polynomial with complex coefficients should have complex (2D) inputs and complex (also 2D) outputs so you would need a 4D graph.

- 4 years, 9 months ago

no it is still 3d.the x-z plane is like an input plane!!!

- 4 years, 9 months ago