## Excel in math and science

### Master concepts by solving fun, challenging problems.

## It's hard to learn from lectures and videos

### Learn more effectively through short, conceptual quizzes.

## Our wiki is made for math and science

###
Master advanced concepts through explanations,

examples, and problems from the community.

## Used and loved by 4 million people

###
Learn from a vibrant community of students and enthusiasts,

including olympiad champions, researchers, and professionals.

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWhen I was taking AP Physics in my Junior year, I always had fun trying to leave all my work in terms of variables until the end, and avoid substituting in values in intermediate calculations. When I finished the following problem it gave me much joy to see that the equation was correct.

Problem: http://imgur.com/Aui8aR2

\[v_3=\sqrt{2gy_2+\left(\frac{\left(m_{G+S}\right)\sqrt{2gy_1+\left({\frac{v_1 m_G}{m_{G+S}}}\right)^2}}{m_{G+S+B}}\right)^2}=15.6 \, \mathrm{\frac{m}{s}}\] – Ricky Escobar · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

– Tim Vermeulen · 3 years, 11 months ago

I do that too, not using a calculating till the very end :DLog in to reply

There are many, actually. That depends on how you define "the best problem". Some problems (particularly in Physics and Chemistry) are beautiful since they are composed of applications of a variety of techniques, while Mathematics problems are based on mechanical reasoning, mostly. But you can't deny the joy that lies herewith. I have solved many good problems but let me recollect a small incident. I was then a ten years old child, and I didn't know the sum of first n natural numbers. In our school, it was taught much, much later, say, 3 years later, while performing statistical experiments. I curiously took up a problem of summing, and actually DEVISED this method of n(n+1)/2. And my joy knew no bounds when I could solve each and every summation using this formula. Those three years were the best in my life, as I felt I had invented some ingenious formula, and never told it to anyone. And you can expect how shattered I was when I saw how my INVENTED formula was right there on a page of a book, staring back and laughing at me. Well, this seems funny now, but I was only a kid back then. – Christopher Johnboy · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

– Bob Krueger · 3 years, 11 months ago

I know the feeling. Just over a year ago I basically proved the multinomial theorem, taking an n-termed polynomial to the m-th power. And then no more than three months later I stumbled upon the multinomial theorem on wikipedia. Dreams crushed.Log in to reply

But, that's also the great thing about maths. It's the ability for you to figure out what patterns exist in the data that you're given, make conjecture about the validity of certain statements, and then prove those statements, or find a counter-example to show why you are wrong. – Calvin Lin Staff · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

– Shourya Pandey · 3 years, 11 months ago

The same here... :(Log in to reply

When I was about five or six years old, I discovered something I thought was extraordinary: if you take a number and square it, it it one more than the product of the two adjacent numbers to the original number. For example, \(5^2=25\) is one more than \(4\cdot 6=24\). I did not know algebra to proof it at that point, but I tried it many times (even for negative numbers) and I was sure it would be true for every number.

Only much later (in 8th grade) I continued my investigations. What if you would not take the product of the two adjacent numbers to the original number, but numbers that are further off? For example, \(5^2=25\) and \(3\cdot 7=21\), that's a difference of \(4=2^2\)! The difference would always be the square of the original difference. I had algebra back then to prove it, and I felt like a real mathematician. Literally a week later, it was taught at my high school, as just a little trick. I was very angry for the fact that my school had demoted such a wonderful identity to just a little trick.

Later on, quite recently, before being exposed to the awesome world of olympiad mathematics, I thought the following: if \(4\) times \(8\) does not get me to \(6^2\), what do I have to multiply \(4\) with to get to \(6^2\)? It turned out to be \(9\). I tried to generalise. I always seemed to get three elements of a geometric series, which I thought was quite fascinating. I proved it with simple algebra.

Those were my own discoveries I'm very proud of, especially the first one. I know that it is not really a problem I have solved, but you said 'anything will do', so… ;-) – Tim Vermeulen · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

All i can say is that moment is exhilarating!!! No one around only you and the problem that just got solved. – Harsa Mitra · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

When I was in 9th grade, I solved the following problem:

Find all natural number triples (x,y,z) such that \[2^x + 3^y = 4^z + 1.\]I solved this problem without sleeping; it took me an entire day. This was my first exposure to interesting problems.

In retrospect, I think it was a simple problem. The joy of getting an answer after spending hours of thinking is a thrill. I still seek that thrill and solve problems. I run local math competitions for high school students and have also introduced a weekly undergraduate problem solving seminar in my university.

I just want more people to appreciate the thrill of problem solving. I like this site.

Coming back to the thread, the most recent best question I tried was:

Prove that an infinite number of points in the plane can have mutual integer distances only if all the points lie on a straight lineIt's called the Erdos-Anning theorem. It has a wonderful proof. – Sri Kanth · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

– Calvin Lin Staff · 3 years, 11 months ago

The proof is great. It makes good use of the fact that 2 conics can intersect in at most 4 points.Log in to reply

I won't claim that it's the "best" problem I've ever solved, but one of my favorite problems (in the sense that I enjoyed the process of coming up with a solution) is one from extremal graph theory:

"Prove that any simple graph on \( n \) vertices and \( e \) edges has at least \( \frac{e}{3n}(4e-n^2) \) triangles." – Hero P. · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Well..The best problem I have ever solved is coming up with my username...jk Actually, in my opinion, every problem is a little part of a bigger "whole". We are just coming in closer and closer to this "whole" , but never quite reaching it, like how \[ \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2^i} \] approaches but never touches two. – Anthony J. · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

I am not able to remember many, if I will recall it I would really tell you. But the most difficult problem for me on Brilliant was the "primed triangles". – Siddharth Kumar · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Primed Triangles question.

This is a link to theSiddharth, if you want to replace it with your own, let me know and I'd pull my link down. You can then see how many people have worked on the problem through clicking your link. – Calvin Lin Staff · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

– Tim Vermeulen · 3 years, 11 months ago

Could you either post a link to that problem or put it into words yourself? You've made me curious, but Google isn't able to find it. :)Log in to reply

– Siddharth Kumar · 3 years, 11 months ago

This is the link to the problem "primed triangles" :- https://brilliant.org/assessment/s/algebra-and-number-theory/351092/Log in to reply

– Mursalin Habib · 3 years, 11 months ago

If anyone other than you follows the link you provided, they'll be redirected to their challenge page with the heading 'problem record not found'. Try posting the 'share this problem' link.Log in to reply

– Siddharth Kumar · 3 years, 11 months ago

Okay, this would work, click on this link for "primed triangles" :- https://brilliant.org/i/rLVfAD/Log in to reply

– Mursalin Habib · 3 years, 11 months ago

Just solved 'Primed Triangles'. Nice problem!Log in to reply

https://brilliant.org/i/OUN6fq/ I had to spend a lot of time on this problem.I thought over the problem so much at times that I couldn't focus on anything else.Oneday after a nap I don't know what happened but I grabbed my copy and started attempting the problem,at that moment everything seemed so clear,had to do approximation while getting a root of a quadratic which i really don't like,but the experience was totally awesome. – Soham Chanda · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Hint:For any ride, there are at most 3 people who didn't ride it. – Calvin Lin Staff · 3 years, 11 months agoLog in to reply

This problem is absolutely wonderful:

Lazy Liz's Escape, currently in the level 4 Geometry and Combinatorics set ( https://brilliant.org/i/YzpBhp/ ). I'm pretty sure I missed the proper way to solve it, and I can't wait to see the worked solution next week. How I did it: just try some lower values, making a conjecture without even proving it… I found the fibonacci numbers, triangle numbers, binomial coefficients and other things I do not understand yet in a problem stated so simply. Amazing. – Tim Vermeulen · 3 years, 11 months agoLog in to reply

I think that I have way too many favorites but in geometry I really really like this problem. I am very bad at geometry but this problem was so neat I actually took the time to go through it. I specially like it because it involves so many different ideas at the same time. http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=2456654&sid=27636296f39c4ce8533cb20c72415848#p2456654 – Jose R Urriola · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Well https://brilliant.org/assessment/s/geometry-and-combinatorics/191578/ – Soham Chanda · 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

– Mursalin Habib · 3 years, 11 months ago

That link is unique to you. Try posting the 'share this problem' link.Log in to reply

– Soham Chanda · 3 years, 11 months ago

sorry bro forgot bout that..Log in to reply

– Tim Vermeulen · 3 years, 11 months ago

That gives me an error.Log in to reply