@Arihant Jain
–
its more of a trial and error in an organised way.. say you have x,y and z in the order - x>=y>=z.. then the smallest three digit number possible is (zyx) for a constant sum ..ratio- (zyx):(z+y+x).. so lets start with 111 (smallest for all digits equal)- sum = 3 number - 111 .. now if i increase it by 1 i.e 112 then sum = 4.. percentage increase in sum = 33.33% .. in number - 0.9% .. decreases a lot .. now once u reach 119 the ratio has dropped continuosly .. our nest option would now be to increase the digit in units place.. until we see the ratio decreasing ... finally we end up at 199 :11 ... we do not go to 211 because 211:4 >111:3 (because 111 got doubled almost and 3 increased only around 30%.. ) and so on 299:20> 199:19 for the same reason .. Hence it can be showed that 199 is the answer ..
–
Raviteja Meesala
·
4 years, 5 months ago

@Tan Li Xuan
–
its more of a trial and error in an organised way.. say you have x,y and z in the order - x>=y>=z.. then the smallest three digit number possible is (zyx) for a constant sum ..ratio- (zyx):(z+y+x).. so lets start with 111 (smallest for all digits equal)- sum = 3 number - 111 .. now if i increase it by 1 i.e 112 then sum = 4.. percentage increase in sum = 33.33% .. in number - 0.9% .. decreases a lot .. now once u reach 119 the ratio has dropped continuosly .. our nest option would now be to increase the digit in units place.. until we see the ratio decreasing ... finally we end up at 199 :11 ... we do not go to 211 because 211:4 >111:3 (because 111 got doubled almost and 3 increased only around 30%.. ) and so on 299:20> 199:19 for the same reason .. Hence it can be showed that 199 is the answer ...
–
Raviteja Meesala
·
4 years, 5 months ago

I didn't expect this from you. Tell me your id and I will email the whole solution to you. Believe me. You know me personally think...Or I will email the whole thing..............
–
Brilliant Kumar
·
4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

For maximum ratio it is \( 1\):\( 10^{n-1} \) for an n digit number
–
Tan Li Xuan
·
4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

1 digit numbers = 1:1 2 digit numbers = 2:11 3 digit numbers = 3:111 so \( n \) : \( n \) ones
–
Tan Li Xuan
·
4 years, 5 months ago

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestits is 199/19 = 10.47.. unlike 111/3 = 37 suggested above – Raviteja Meesala · 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

– Arihant Jain · 4 years, 5 months ago

What is the proof of your ANSWER please tell meLog in to reply

– Raviteja Meesala · 4 years, 5 months ago

its more of a trial and error in an organised way.. say you have x,y and z in the order - x>=y>=z.. then the smallest three digit number possible is (zyx) for a constant sum ..ratio- (zyx):(z+y+x).. so lets start with 111 (smallest for all digits equal)- sum = 3 number - 111 .. now if i increase it by 1 i.e 112 then sum = 4.. percentage increase in sum = 33.33% .. in number - 0.9% .. decreases a lot .. now once u reach 119 the ratio has dropped continuosly .. our nest option would now be to increase the digit in units place.. until we see the ratio decreasing ... finally we end up at 199 :11 ... we do not go to 211 because 211:4 >111:3 (because 111 got doubled almost and 3 increased only around 30%.. ) and so on 299:20> 199:19 for the same reason .. Hence it can be showed that 199 is the answer ..Log in to reply

– Tan Li Xuan · 4 years, 5 months ago

Ok,thanks for correcting me,but what exactly is the formula?Log in to reply

– Raviteja Meesala · 4 years, 5 months ago

its more of a trial and error in an organised way.. say you have x,y and z in the order - x>=y>=z.. then the smallest three digit number possible is (zyx) for a constant sum ..ratio- (zyx):(z+y+x).. so lets start with 111 (smallest for all digits equal)- sum = 3 number - 111 .. now if i increase it by 1 i.e 112 then sum = 4.. percentage increase in sum = 33.33% .. in number - 0.9% .. decreases a lot .. now once u reach 119 the ratio has dropped continuosly .. our nest option would now be to increase the digit in units place.. until we see the ratio decreasing ... finally we end up at 199 :11 ... we do not go to 211 because 211:4 >111:3 (because 111 got doubled almost and 3 increased only around 30%.. ) and so on 299:20> 199:19 for the same reason .. Hence it can be showed that 199 is the answer ...Log in to reply

– Tan Li Xuan · 4 years, 5 months ago

Thanks!Log in to reply

See this discussion. – Calvin Lin Staff · 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

I didn't expect this from you. Tell me your id and I will email the whole solution to you. Believe me. You know me personally think...Or I will email the whole thing.............. – Brilliant Kumar · 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

For maximum ratio it is \( 1\):\( 10^{n-1} \) for an n digit number – Tan Li Xuan · 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

1 digit numbers = 1:1 2 digit numbers = 2:11 3 digit numbers = 3:111 so \( n \) : \( n \) ones – Tan Li Xuan · 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply