So your calculator has to have more precision than that. I know which is larger, but don't have a helpful answer as to why, or why they are so close. I'm looking forward to further discussion...

You can always construct rational numbers that are arbitrarily close to a given irrational number.

There are some specific cases where a rational number may have some basis in a series expansion or something else interesting. I haven't figured anything special out in this case, but I don't have much experience doing something like that.

I hope we'll get some more insight here eventually.

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewest\(\large e^7-e= \boxed{1093.9148765}999995540283599508167687699444618877399\)

\(\large \frac{3758537274}{3435859}= \boxed{1093.9148766}000001746288191686562225050562319350125\)

I calculate it using a website.

Here I can see the second one is a bit greater than first.

Log in to reply

They are the same to 17 digits: 1093.914876600000

So your calculator has to have more precision than that. I know which is larger, but don't have a helpful answer as to why, or why they are so close. I'm looking forward to further discussion...

Log in to reply

Even 22/7 is close to pi but not to that much accuracy and precision as this number is close to 'e'

Log in to reply

You can always construct rational numbers that are arbitrarily close to a given irrational number.

There are some specific cases where a rational number may have some basis in a series expansion or something else interesting. I haven't figured anything special out in this case, but I don't have much experience doing something like that.

I hope we'll get some more insight here eventually.

Log in to reply

I agree that we will learn something interesting here. I am thankful to Mr. Pi Han Goh for posting this wonderful relationship.

Log in to reply

I took the value of e till 6 decimal places and I observed that e was smaller than the rational no.

Though, it's a very close case and if we increase the value of decimal places of e, we might get closer look.

Unfortunately, my calculator isn't that advanced.

It's a great question and observation. I am eager to know the answer!

Log in to reply