Integration of Logarithmic Functions
The derivative of the logarithm is , but what is the antiderivative? This turns out to be a little trickier, and has to be done using a clever integration by parts.
The logarithm is a basic function from which many other functions are built, so learning to integrate it substantially broadens the kinds of integrals we can tackle.
Integrating
In the equation above, is the constant of integration, and this notation will be used throughout the wiki.
For this solution, we will use integration by parts:
We use and , which means that . Plugging these into our integration by parts formula, we get
We can factorize a bit and get the desired formula
This shows that an unlikely application of an integration technique can actually be the right way forward!
Now that we know how to integrate this, let's apply the properties of logarithms to see how to work with similar problems.
Evaluate .
According to the properties of logarithms, we know that
and thus
Evaluate
According to the properties of logarithms, we have
Hence the given integral can be rewritten as
When integrating the logarithm of a polynomial with at least two terms, the technique of -substitution is needed. The following are some examples of integrating logarithms via U-substitution:
Evaluate .
For this problem, we use -substitution. Let Then we have or and the given integral can be rewritten as follows:
Evaluate .
According to the properties of logarithms, we have
Now let Then we have and the integral can be rewritten as follows:
Integrating Functions of
We now look at examples where we're integrating functions of . These problems often require familiarity with integration by parts, -substitution and form.
Evaluate .
To solve this, we use the principle of integration by parts. Let and Then we have
More generally,
The proof of this is similar to the above.
Evaluate .
To solve this, we use -substitution. Let Then since we know that
More generally,
The proof of this is similar to the above.
Show that .
Perceive as Then since the given integral will give the form as follows:
Alternative Solution: We can also use the substitution As we know that
Evaluate .
Let and Then since and we have
Using the formula which we have learned above, we have
Some problems can be very complex so that they require using both integration by parts and -substitution.
Evaluate .
We use the substitution Then since or we have From the relationship we know that Hence Now let and Then since and we have Using integration by parts once again, we have substituting which into gives Now we finally have
Proof of using Taylor Series
If we don't want to use integration by parts, we can also solve our original integral using Taylor expansion.
We know that the Taylor series expansion of is By integrating both sides, we get We want to compare this with the Taylor series expansion of Multiplying both sides of by gives Then we add to both sides to obtain Finally, subtracting from both sides gives which is identical with except for the constant term (which is irrelevant, since there is always a constant of integration). Therefore we can conclude that