Limits of Sequences
The limit of a sequence is the value the sequence approaches as the number of terms goes to infinity. Not every sequence has this behavior: those that do are called convergent, while those that don't are called divergent.
Limits capture the long-term behavior of a sequence and are thus very useful in bounding them. They also crop up frequently in real analysis.
Contents
Convergence of Sequences
Here, we will be discussing the aspects you will need to know for understanding the concept of convergence of a sequence. We will be delivering you a step-by-step presentation of all the concepts. First, what exactly is a sequence?
A sequence is a function defined as , and is usually denoted by or simply by We call the term of the sequence or the value of the sequence at For example,
- generates the sequence
- generates the sequence
- generates the sequence
- generates the sequence
- generates the sequence
- generates the sequence
- generates the sequence .
As we are now familiar with sequences, let us try to understand what the limit of a sequence represents. In simple words, a limit is a mathematically precise way to talk about approaching a value, without having to evaluate it directly.
A real number is the limit of the sequence if the numbers in the sequence become closer and closer to and not to any other number. In a general sense, the limit of a sequence is the value that it approaches with arbitrary closeness.
For example, if for some constant then and if then .
When the limit of a sequence as approaches a single value, we say the sequence converges. Let's define the convergence of a sequence in a formal way:
We say that a sequence converges if there exists such that for every , there exists a positive integer such that or for all .
It can be easily verified that if such a number exists then it is unique. In this case, we say that the sequence converges to and we call the limit of the sequence . If is the limit of , we write .
Remark: The convergence of each sequence given in the above examples is verified directly from the definition. In general, verifying the convergence directly from the definition is a difficult task. We will see some methods to find the limits of certain sequences and some sufficient conditions for the convergence of a sequence.
Now that we got the concept of convergence in theoretical terms, it's time now to work out some examples and build a strong foundation of the convergence of sequences. Here we go::
Does the following sequence converge:
The sequence seems to be approaching 0. The larger gets, the smaller and smaller the term becomes towards 0. Thus, the sequence converges.
Proof:
For arbitrary , the inequality is true for all and thus for all , where is any positive integer such that . Thus for any , there is a positive integer such that for every .
Does the following sequence generated by the function converge:
In this sequence, we see that the values are decreasing as increases, and eventually approach a single value. The larger we take the value of , the closer and closer the term becomes to 1. Hence the elements of the given sequence approach 1 when approaches infinity. So the sequence converges to 1.
Does the following sequence generated by the function converge:
The sequence seems to be approaching 0. The larger gets, the closer the term gets to 0. Thus, the sequence converges. Though the elements of the sequence oscillate, they “eventually approach” the single point 0. The common feature of these sequences is that the terms of each sequence “accumulate” at only one point.
Let
Evaluate
Now, let's define the divergence of a sequence:
We say that a function diverges if the limit does not exist.
Does the following sequence converge:
It is clear that the sequence bounces back and forth between 1 and -1, and it doesn't converge down to a value. We say that the sequence diverges. The elements of the sequence oscillate between two different points −1 and 1, which means the elements of the sequence come close to −1 and 1 “frequently” as increases.
We say that a function diverges to infinity, if it tends to positive infinity or negative infinity.
For an example, and are such functions.
Does the following sequence converge:
The sequence of integers is unbounded above. Such sequences would diverge to (positive) infinity. The values of the sequence become larger and larger and do not accumulate anywhere.
Does the following sequence converge:
Note 1: In the above examples, we see that if the difference between successive terms is bounded below by a constant 2 in the example, 1 in the example then such a sequence diverges. It will be shown below that if a sequence converges, then the limit of the difference between successive terms is 0.
Note 2: It is true that if a positive sequence is non-decreasing, then the limit exists. However, we might not be able to easily determine the limit.
Graphical Examples
Graphical interpretation of sequences is an easy tool to determine convergence:
- sometimes it is easy to see;
- sometimes we might draw the wrong conclusion, e.g.
Find the limit
Let's evaluate the first few terms of this sequence.
- For .
- For .
- For .
- For .
- For .
Since the terms of the sequence oscillate between -1 and 1, we can conclude the sequence diverges or doesn't converge down to a single value.
Find the limit of the sequence
If we write out the initial few terms, we will get and so on. It is not immediately apparent what the limit is.
Let's think about what happens when is really large.
- If , then so .
- If , then so .
- If , then so .
Thus, the limit of the sequence is 0.
Using Properties of Limits
You should be familiar with the following properties of limits. If the limits and exist and are finite, then
What is the limit of the sequence
To start, let's list out the terms.
- For , .
- For , .
- For , .
- For , .
- For , .
We see that the terms are increasing, and seem to be getting close to 1.
Notice that another way of writing the sequence is as . We know that the limit of the constant 1 is just 1, and the limit of is 0, so we can apply the first rule to conclude that
Find
We know that Therefore, by applying the third rule, we have
Find
By factoring the term of highest degree from both the numerator and denominator, we have Now, by applying the results of previous examples that and we have Therefore,
Find
By using the property of logarithm that we can rewrite the given equation and get the limit value as follows:
Bonus: Try converting the limit to a Riemann sum.
Tetration is defined as
Find the value of
Find
Observe that then the value of the given equation can be calculated as follows:
For a positive integer let be the fractional part of Then find
For a positive integer, it must be true that which implies Hence, we have Therefore, the integer part of is and the fractional part of it is Thus, we have
Clarification: Take as a constant.
If
then what is
More questions related to KVPY:
Epsilon-delta Definition
Main Article: Epsilon-Delta Definition of a Limit
Stated precisely, the epsilon-delta definition of a limit is if for every there exists a positive integer such that
If the sequence converges, then
Note: The converse of the theorem is not true. For example, consider the sequence , which is the sum of the reciprocals. The difference of successive terms is which tends to 0. However, the sum of reciprocals diverges to infinity.