I'm facing a problem regarding which books to refer, A Das Gupta or Cengage (As subjective might make me slow and objective might not ensure conceptual clarity). Could you kindly comment?

i actually use cengage for both physics and maths. Cengage has quite a good number of subjective questions in each chapter,so you should not worry about conceptual clarity.

Neat. I like this. I have to go now, but will come back and check this.

The way to approach this is to think equilibrium. If the thin rod is not moving, then it is in equilibrium. All torques (taken about any convenient point must sum to zero. And all forces must sum to zero.

Let mu the coefficient of friction be u...
So imagine that u is large and the rod is horizontal. The CCW rotating axle gives the hoop a leftward pointing force. Take torques about the center of the hoop. That force is mu* m * g and it makes a torque out of the page equal to

r * u * m * g The bob makes a torque = m * g * (l+r) sine (theta) into the page and that is equal to the first torque.

So sine (theta) = r * u * m * g / ( m * g * ( l+r) ) = r * u / ( l+r)

Thus theta = arcsine ( r * u / ( l+r ) ) This is true for the hoop touching the axle at the top of the hoop.

it will touch at an angle though, and that will make the mg break into components, in the r * u * m * g part. So that is messier. I will come back to this.

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestLog in to reply

Thanks!!!

Log in to reply

@A E Hi, I wanted an advice from your side.

I'm facing a problem regarding which books to refer, A Das Gupta or Cengage (As subjective might make me slow and objective might not ensure conceptual clarity). Could you kindly comment?

Log in to reply

i actually use cengage for both physics and maths. Cengage has quite a good number of subjective questions in each chapter,so you should not worry about conceptual clarity.

Log in to reply

Thanks!

Log in to reply

Neat. I like this. I have to go now, but will come back and check this.

The way to approach this is to think equilibrium. If the thin rod is not moving, then it is in equilibrium. All torques (taken about any convenient point must sum to zero. And all forces must sum to zero.

Let mu the coefficient of friction be u... So imagine that u is large and the rod is horizontal. The CCW rotating axle gives the hoop a leftward pointing force. Take torques about the center of the hoop. That force is mu* m * g and it makes a torque out of the page equal to

r * u * m * g The bob makes a torque = m * g * (l+r) sine (theta) into the page and that is equal to the first torque.

So sine (theta) = r * u * m * g / ( m * g * ( l+r) ) = r * u / ( l+r)

Thus theta = arcsine ( r * u / ( l+r ) ) This is true for the hoop touching the axle at the top of the hoop.

it will touch at an angle though, and that will make the mg break into components, in the r * u * m * g part. So that is messier. I will come back to this.

Log in to reply

Torque applies here??

Log in to reply

Tan(Equlibruim angle)= (ur)/(l+r) Is that right ??

Log in to reply

Any ideas guyzzz????

Log in to reply

Has anybody solved this yet?

Log in to reply

Thanks for the q.let me try.

Log in to reply

@Harsh Shrivastava

Log in to reply

@Spandan Senapati

Log in to reply