He has done nothing wrong. He was very careful with the wording, knew the limits of his approach and even hinted, his proof wouldn't be complete.
The assumption \(b = a^k \) is perfectly fine. It was not postulated, \(k\) would be a integer. Proving \(k\) being an integer is the actual "difficult" part.
There just missed the part for showing \( n \ !| \ k \) contradicts A. However I added that part, you may bother reading my post with the included link.

I'm sorry - my solution above is wrong as we cannot assume that \(b=a^k\), but we instead have to prove that the statement \(a^n-1|b^n-1\) implies \(b=a^k\). I've asked help from my friend and his suggestion is 'every prime that can divide \(b\) must also divide \(a\)'. However, I still have no idea how to prove.

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestSuppose that \(a,b,n\) are integers

\[\frac{b^{n}-1}{a^{n}-1}=m\]

let \(b=a^{k}\)

\[\frac{a^{nk}-1}{a^{n}-1}=m\]

if \(n|k\),

\(a^{nk}-1 = (a^n-1)(a^k+a^{k-n}+a^{k-2n}+...a^n+1)\)

Hence, \[\frac{b^{n}-1}{a^{n}-1}=\frac{(a^n-1)(a^k+a^{k-n}+a^{k-2n}+...a^n+1)}{a^{n}-1}=a^k+a^{k-n}+a^{k-2n}+...a^n+1=m\]

Thus, when \(k\) is any number which can be divided by \(n\), \(b=a^k\)

*not sure if this is correct, waiting for others to complete

Log in to reply

This should do.

Log in to reply

Your proof is not correct.

Let A: \( a^n -1 | b^n -1 \).

and B : \( b = a^k \)

You have to prove that A implies B. What you've proven is that B implies A. Both are not the same thing. You can see this with the help of an example.

Suppose we want to prove " every integer x is even". (Obviously false).

Take A: x is an integer

and B: x is an even number.

We see that B implies A, but A does not imply B.

Log in to reply

He has done nothing wrong. He was very careful with the wording, knew the limits of his approach and even hinted, his proof wouldn't be complete. The assumption \(b = a^k \) is perfectly fine. It was not postulated, \(k\) would be a integer. Proving \(k\) being an integer is the actual "difficult" part. There just missed the part for showing \( n \ !| \ k \) contradicts A. However I added that part, you may bother reading my post with the included link.

Log in to reply

I'm sorry - my solution above is wrong as we cannot assume that \(b=a^k\), but we instead have to prove that the statement \(a^n-1|b^n-1\) implies \(b=a^k\). I've asked help from my friend and his suggestion is 'every prime that can divide \(b\) must also divide \(a\)'. However, I still have no idea how to prove.

Log in to reply

Hey I did not understand how did you find \(b=a^{k}\)

Log in to reply