Prove the following -

\[\displaystyle \begin{equation*} 1 - \cfrac{1}{n+\cfrac{2n}{n-3+\cfrac{3(n-1)}{n-5+\cfrac{4(n-2)}{\ddots \cfrac{(m-1)(n-m+3)}{n-(2m-3)}}}}} \end{equation*} = \sum_{0\le k <m}{\dfrac{{(-1)}^k}{\binom{n}{k}}} = \dfrac{n+1}{n+2}\left(1 + \frac{{(-1)}^{m+1}}{\binom{n+1}{m}}\right) \]

The continued fraction part is optional. It is just a bonus.

*This is completely original.*

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewest\[\text{S}=\displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^{m-1}\dfrac{(-1)^r}{\dbinom{n}{r}}\]

\[=\displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^{m-1}(-1)^r\dfrac{r!(n-r)!}{n!}\]

\[=\displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^{m-1}(-1)^r \dfrac{r!(n-r)!\color{blue}{(n-r+1+r+1)}}{n!}\color{red}{\times\dfrac{1}{(n+2)}}\]

\[=\displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^{m-1}\dfrac{1}{n!(n+2)}\left[(-1)^r\left\{r!(n-r+1)!+(n-r)!(r+1)!\right\}\right]\]

\[=\displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^{m-1}\dfrac{1}{n!(n+2)}\left[T_{r} - T_{r+1}\right]\]

where \(T_{r} = (-1)^r r!(n-r+1)! \)

Evaluating using telescoping the sum, we have,

\[\text{S} = \dfrac{n+1}{n+2}\left(1+\dfrac{(-1)^{m+1}}{\dbinom{n+1}{m}}\right)\]

Some other methods can be to use Beta functions or using the result (from Partial Fractions)

\[\dfrac{1}{\binom{n}{k}}=\sum_{j=1}^k(-1)^{k-j}\binom{k}{j}\dfrac{j}{n-j+1}\]

The continued fraction result is fascinating! I'll work on it when I get some time.

Log in to reply

@Kartik Sharma Btw, what was your approach to this problem?

Log in to reply

I used Finite Calculus(Gosper's Method). I thought of beta functions but it was tedious. Telescoping serious was very nice although a bit too tricky.

I will add my method later. For the continued fraction part if you are asking, then I used a standard result in the theory of evaluating continued fractions.

Log in to reply

Gosper's method?

I was talking about the summation. I assume thisI have added some explanation in the telescoping part for clarity

Log in to reply

Log in to reply