Suppose we want to interpolate an infinite number of points on the Cartesian plane using a continuous and differentiable function $f$. How can this be done?

**Solution**

Given $n$ points on the Cartesian plane, the set of points can be interpolated using a polynomial of at least degree $n-1$. Given an infinite number of points to interpolate, we need an infinite polynomial:

$f(x) = {a}_{0} + {a}_{1}(x-{x}_{0}) + {a}_{2}{(x-{x}_{0})}^{2} +...$ where $\left|x-{x}_{0}\right|$ is within the radius of convergence.

Observation: $f({x}_{0}) = {a}_{0}$ $f'({x}_{0}) = {a}_{1}$ $f''({x}_{0}) = 2{a}_{2}$ $f'''({x}_{0}) = 6{a}_{3}$ ${f}^{(4)}({x}_{0}) = 24{a}_{4}$ ${f}^{(n)}({x}_{0}) = n!{a}_{n}$

Solving for each constant term expands the original function into the infinite polynomial: $f(x) = \sum _{ n=0 }^{ \infty }{ \frac { 1 }{ n! } { f }^{ (n) }({ x }_{ 0 } } ){ (x-{ x }_{ 0 }) }^{ n }.$

Check out my other notes at Proof, Disproof, and Derivation

No vote yet

1 vote

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in`\(`

...`\)`

or`\[`

...`\]`

to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestI find this interesting. I use Taylor Series a lot but I had never thought of what actually gives rise to them. Great note!

Log in to reply

There is probably a more rigorous proof out there. This note is more of an intuitive derivation than a proof.

Log in to reply

I still thought it was pretty informative.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply