After looking at the diagram of Extremes with Equilaterals, a question came to mind:

Given two concentric circles of radii $r_1$ and $r_2$, find a function $f(r_1,r_2)$ that outputs the side length of the smallest equilateral triangle such that one side is tangent to one of the circle and another side is tangent to the other circle. The sides themselves must be touching the circle, not just the extensions of the sides.

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

$</code> ... <code>$</code>...<code>."> Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in $</span> ... <span>$ or $</span> ... <span>$ to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestOooh that is tough. But won't this note help people with the problem? :P

Log in to reply

No, it won't. In fact, I am pretty sure it is impossible in my original problem for this double-tangency situation to occur. This new problem was just inspired by the previous problem.

Log in to reply

How?

Log in to reply

$\ddot\smile$

Sorry, edited comment to be more clearLog in to reply

My first thought is that such a configuration is not possible. I found an assumption, corrected for it, and only have solutions where $r_1 = \frac{1}{2} r_2$. I'd be interesting in seeing the general case.

Log in to reply

The vertices of the equilateral triangle not necessarily have to lie on the circles.

Also you missed the case where $r_1=r_2$ I think. (using your interpretation) or I'm missing something on what you are interpreting it as.

Log in to reply

Ah yes. I was misled by the reference to the other question.

Haha, I assumed that $r_1 \neq r_2$, so that's another assumption that needed to be corrected. Thanks!

Log in to reply

I think that r2 = 0 and then the second circle is a point circle then the r1 will be altitude of the equilateral triangle then side of the equilateral triangle 2r1÷√3

Log in to reply