Exponential Diophantine Equation Troubles

Hello, fellow Brillianters, how are you all doing?

Recently I came across this question here, and whilst trying to come up with a proof for my solution, I stumbled upon this equation here:

\(2*5^{a} - 1 = b^{2}\), where both a and b are non-negative integers.

I wanted to prove that there are only three pairs of solutions \((a,b)\) for this question; namely, \((0, 1)\), \((1, 3)\) and \((2, 7)\).

My first impulse was to try to prove that if any odd integer \(b\), \(b > 7\), is not a solution, then \(b + 4\) cannot be a solution as well. I thought that it was sufficient until Calvin Lin came along and showed me that I only proved that \(b\) and \(b + 4\) cannot be solutions at the same time. Worst part is that he has no idea either of how to prove this.

So here I am, my friends; do you know a way to prove my statement right (or wrong)? I'd appreciate any form of help you can provide me. Thanks!

Note by Alexandre Miquilino
4 years, 1 month ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 \( 2 \times 3 \)
2^{34} \( 2^{34} \)
a_{i-1} \( a_{i-1} \)
\frac{2}{3} \( \frac{2}{3} \)
\sqrt{2} \( \sqrt{2} \)
\sum_{i=1}^3 \( \sum_{i=1}^3 \)
\sin \theta \( \sin \theta \)
\boxed{123} \( \boxed{123} \)


Sort by:

Top Newest

This is a Ramanujan-Nagell type equation.

According to Wikipedia, a result of Siegel implies that the number of solutions in each case is finite, but not much further is known.

I believe It is unlikely that there is a simply proof of this statement.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply


Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...