Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

Geometric/Algebraic Inequality

I have a geometric proof if anyone could try and prove. Keep in mind for the following:
1. Sides a,b,c form a triangle.
2. Sides (a+x),(b+y),(c+z) also form a triangle.
3. x+y+z=0.
4. Assume without loss of generality that a>b>c, and x>0.
Thanks!

Note by Pickle Lamborghini
2 years, 1 month ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 \( 2 \times 3 \)
2^{34} \( 2^{34} \)
a_{i-1} \( a_{i-1} \)
\frac{2}{3} \( \frac{2}{3} \)
\sqrt{2} \( \sqrt{2} \)
\sum_{i=1}^3 \( \sum_{i=1}^3 \)
\sin \theta \( \sin \theta \)
\boxed{123} \( \boxed{123} \)

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

I don't think condition 4 is a "without loss of generality".

Calvin Lin Staff - 2 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Could you explain that? I don't really understand why not. Thanks.

Pickle Lamborghini - 2 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Say that \( a = 11, b = 10, c = 9 \) and \( x = -1, y = 0 , z = 1 \). How do you want to reorder the terms (IE WLOG) such that your condition 4 holds?

Calvin Lin Staff - 2 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Maybe we could let \(x = 1\) ? That satisfies the fact the \(x > 0\). I'm just trying to say that the greatest's (of sides \(a, b, c\)) corresponding \(x, y, z\) should be assumed to be positive, which would help with the proof. :D

Pickle Lamborghini - 2 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Pickle Lamborghini Why can we let \( x = 1 \)? \(a, b, c, x, ,y z \) are "constants" that are given, and we cannot simply let them be what we want them to be.

However, "help with the proof" could be elaborated on better. If we can show that when \(a, b, c \) and \( x, y, ,z \) are similarly ordered, then the RHS decreases, then yes we could make the assumption that \( a> b> c \) and \( x > y > z \), which gives us \( x > 0 \).

Calvin Lin Staff - 2 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...