\(ABC\) any triangle

Any \(BD\) and \(CE\) drawn such that \(D\) lies on \(AC\) and \(E\) lies on \(AB\)

\(DE\) drawn

\(BD\) and \(CE\) intersect at \(I\)

\(AO=OI\)

\(EN=ND\)

\(BM=MC\)

Prove that \(M-N-O\) are collinear

No vote yet

9 votes

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWe will use normalized barycentric coordinates \(A = (1,0,0)\), \(B = (0,1,0)\), \(C = (0,0,1)\). Then \(D = (p,0,1 - p)\), \(E = (q,1 - q,0)\). Now \(N\) is a midpoint of \(DE\), hence \[N = \left(\frac{p + q}{2}, \frac{1 - q}{2},\frac{1 - p}{2}\right)\] Equation of line \(BD\) is \[pz = (1 - p)x\] and equation of line \(CE\) is \[(1 - q)x = qy\] Intersecting these lines we get \[I = \left(\frac{pq}{p + q - pq}, \frac{p(1 - q)}{p + q - pq}, \frac{q(1 - p)}{p + q - pq}\right)\] Now \(O\) is midpoint of \(AI\), hence \[O = \left(\frac{p + q}{2(p + q - pq)}, \frac{p(1 - q)}{2(p + q - pq)}, \frac{q(1 - p)}{2(p + q - pq)}\right)\] And \(M\) is midpoint of \(BC\), so trivially \[M = \left(0, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}\right)\] Now note that \[\begin{vmatrix} \frac{p + q}{2}& \frac{1 - q}{2}&\frac{1 - p}{2} \\ \frac{p + q}{2(p + q - pq)}& \frac{p(1 - q)}{2(p + q - pq)}& \frac{q(1 - p)}{2(p + q - pq)} \\ 0& 1/2& 1/2 \end{vmatrix} = 0\] Hence \(M,N,O\) are collinear.

Log in to reply

I'm not sure I understand your last step. Are you taking the determinant of a matrix? I'm assuming that's what you're doing. How does that tell you that the three points are co-linear?

Log in to reply

The main idea is: If the area of a triangle is 0, then the vertices lie on a straight line.

Note that once you found the coordinates of the points, you could go about finding the line that these three points are on. However, unless the ratios are immediate, this often requires a bunch more algebra. Showing that the area is 0 could be more straightforward.

Barycentric coordinates merely make the algebra much easier / nicer. A coordinate geometry approach would work similarly, though with much uglier values.

Log in to reply

See here http://zacharyabel.com/papers/Barycentric_A07.pdf page 5.

Log in to reply

This is the Newton-Gauss line of a complete quadrilateral.

Log in to reply

Why did every comment gets vote down?

Log in to reply