What is the remainder if \[1^{2} + 3^{2} + 5^{2} + \cdots+ 2011^{2}\] is divided by 8?

There must be an easy way to solve this. But I couldn't remember that! Help me to find the correct path ...

What is the remainder if \[1^{2} + 3^{2} + 5^{2} + \cdots+ 2011^{2}\] is divided by 8?

There must be an easy way to solve this. But I couldn't remember that! Help me to find the correct path ...

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestAlthough I have provided a solution before, I discovered a much quicker way to do it. If you put them into pairs, it will be

\[(1^2+3^2)+(5^2+7^2)+(9^2+11^2)+\dots+(2009^2+2011^2)\]

This may be written into the form of

\[\sum_{n=1}^{503}((4n-3)^2+(4n-1)^2) = \sum_{n=1}^{503}(32n^2-32n+10)\]

Since \(8|32\), all it matters to find the reminder is

\[\sum_{n=1}^{503}10 = 5030 = 8(628)+6\]

Hence, the reminder is 6 – Kay Xspre · 1 year, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I'm not sure what your central equation is about, since neither of the expressions depend on \(n\). Can you edit it accordingly? – Calvin Lin Staff · 1 year, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

– Kay Xspre · 1 year, 8 months ago

Ouch, thanks Calvin. It supposed to be \(n\) but I am too familiar with \(x\) when writing the expression. I'll edit them now.Log in to reply

– Calvin Lin Staff · 1 year, 8 months ago

I still believe that the equation is wrong. Notice that the RHS is summing up a constant, and doesn't depend on \(n\). Is this intentional?Log in to reply

– Kay Xspre · 1 year, 8 months ago

I suppose to write it with \(n\) by not substituting 503. This is then fixed.Log in to reply

– Calvin Lin Staff · 1 year, 8 months ago

Looks good now :) Thanks!Log in to reply

If you apply remainder theorem then remainder of 1^2 , 3^2 , 5^2 , 7^2 .............2011^2 when divided by 8 seperately will all equal to 1. so their will be 1006 times 1 .which totals 1006. Then remainder of 1006/8 =6. So the remainder will be 6. – Anshul Sanghi · 1 year, 8 months ago

Log in to reply