New user? Sign up

Existing user? Sign in

Prove that if \(n>2\), then \(2^{n+1} > n^2 + n + 2 \) holds true.

Note by Abdelfatah Teamah 9 months, 2 weeks ago

Easy Math Editor

*italics*

_italics_

**bold**

__bold__

- bulleted- list

1. numbered2. list

paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)

> This is a quote

This is a quote

# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"

2 \times 3

2^{34}

a_{i-1}

\frac{2}{3}

\sqrt{2}

\sum_{i=1}^3

\sin \theta

\boxed{123}

Sort by:

Proof By Induction:

Base Case: \(n=3\)

\(2^{3+1}>3²+3+2\implies 16>14\),which is true.

Inductive Step: Let the statement be true for some \(k\).We will prove that it holds for \(k+1\) as well.

By the inductive hypothesis we have \(2^{k+1}>k²+k+2\)

We have to prove that \(2^{k+2}>(k+1)²+(k+1)+2\)

Proof: \[2^{k+2}=2(2^{k+1})>2(k²+k+2)>(k+1)²+(k+1)+2\] The last inequality, after simplifying becomes \(k²>k\),which is true as \(k>2\).

Hence Proved.

Log in to reply

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestProof By Induction:

Base Case: \(n=3\)

\(2^{3+1}>3²+3+2\implies 16>14\),which is true.

Inductive Step: Let the statement be true for some \(k\).We will prove that it holds for \(k+1\) as well.

By the inductive hypothesis we have \(2^{k+1}>k²+k+2\)

We have to prove that \(2^{k+2}>(k+1)²+(k+1)+2\)

Proof: \[2^{k+2}=2(2^{k+1})>2(k²+k+2)>(k+1)²+(k+1)+2\] The last inequality, after simplifying becomes \(k²>k\),which is true as \(k>2\).

Hence Proved.

Log in to reply