Just Curious

As we all know, if a0+a1x+...+anxn=0a_0+a_1x+...+a_nx^n=0 has a solution of p+qip+qi where {a0,a1,...,an}R \left\{ a_0,a_1,...,a_n \right\} \subset \mathbb{R}\ , then pqip-qi is also a solution.

Similarly, if a0+a1x+...+anxn=0a_0+a_1x+...+a_nx^n=0 has a solution of p+qmp+q\sqrt { m } where {a0,a1,...,an}Q andmI \left\{ a_{ 0 },a_{ 1 },...,a_{ n } \right\} \subset \mathbb{Q}\ \quad and\quad \sqrt { m } \in \mathbb{I}\ , then pqmp-q\sqrt { m } is also a solution.

I was playing around with it until I suddenly got curious. If a0+a1x+...+anxn=0(n4andnN )a_{ 0 }+a_{ 1 }x+...+a_{ n }x^{ n }=0\quad (n\ge 4\quad and\quad n\in \mathbb{N}\ ) has a solution of pm+qi(mI )p\sqrt { m } +qi\quad (\sqrt { m } \in \mathbb{I}\ ), then is it safe to assume that it also has the solutions of pmqi,pm+qi,pmqip\sqrt { m } -qi,\quad -p\sqrt { m } +qi,\quad -p\sqrt { m } -qi\quad ?

I tried it for n=4n=4, and it worked.

Can someone confirm this for all values of n's?

Note by Nick Lee
4 years, 7 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

</code>...<code></code> ... <code>.">   Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in </span>...<span></span> ... <span> or </span>...<span></span> ... <span> to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

Yes, your observation is correct. Can you figure out how to prove it?

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Let p+qmp + q\sqrt{m} be a root of a polynomial f(x)f(x).

We can write f(x)f(x) = (x(p+qm)(x-(p + q\sqrt{m})(x(pqm))(x-(p - q\sqrt{m}))a(x)a(x) + r(x)r(x)

r(x)r(x)'s degree would be 1,

    r(x)=ax+b\implies r(x) = ax + b

If we get a=b=0a=b=0,then pqmp - q\sqrt{m} will also be root of f(x)f(x)

Put x=p+qmx = p + q\sqrt{m} & get a=b=0a=b=0.

(This is not a proof but a hint.)

Harsh Shrivastava - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

대입해서 복소수상등 무리수상등을 동시해하시면되는데 그게 힘들죠... 증명해보고잇어요!

찬홍 민 - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...