Magnetic Force with Damping

Note by Steven Chase
1 week, 4 days ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

@Lil Doug @Karan Chatrath

Here is my take on the magnetic problem with damping

Steven Chase - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

Thank you for sharing this note

Karan Chatrath - 1 week, 3 days ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath can you see my note?

Lil Doug - 1 week, 3 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase It was solved.
But thankyou so much for for still providing solution

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase Thanks

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase Have a look on this problem

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

This would be a good problem for the E&M Section

Steven Chase - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase Yes I was thinking that only.
But i want to do it with pen.
Do you want to see my attempt.?

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase in some condition there separation can be \infty also may be.

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

Yes, if E=0 E = 0 , there is no finite maximum separation

Steven Chase - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase we are probably neglecting gravitational force,
If we take G=1G=1 , the question will become more beautiful.

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase i don't know why but, I am not able to think properly what will happen in different cases.

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

Neither am I. Many of these problems are like that. I wonder if the authors have been careful enough in preparing them

Steven Chase - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

For all we know, the solutions might have entirely different forms, depending on the relative strengths of different constants.

Steven Chase - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase I think except E=0E=0 , there can also be some cases, when there will be \infty separation.

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase The answer given in back of the book is in 3 different cases
Like for l<,l=,l>l<, l=, l>
Which is possible.
So the author is. Careful while making them.

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase I am doing, adding the (W)(W)work done by electric field and electrostatic force
And then dWdx=0\frac{dW}{dx}=0

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase In the meantime have a look on this problem

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase Hello, can you post a analytical solution for this problem
Thanks in advance.

Lil Doug - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase Please take a look into this, and sorry for that if it hurt you.
Thanks in advance
Hope I am not disturbing you

Lil Doug - 1 week, 3 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase Sir the problem which you have reported ,only that much information is given in the question in book.
I just notice now a solver. Is it you?

Lil Doug - 1 week, 3 days ago

Log in to reply

Interesting. No, it's not me

Steven Chase - 1 week, 3 days ago

Log in to reply

Oh, I think I missed that the inductors are supposed to be identical. Let me try again with that constraint added

Steven Chase - 1 week, 3 days ago

Log in to reply

Ok, that was the problem. I deleted the report. Thanks

Steven Chase - 1 week, 3 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase sir i think you have solved my latest problem correctly.
Foolish learner has posted a report on it.
Can you post its solution, whenever you will be free.

Lil Doug - 1 week, 2 days ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase hello sir ,can you help me in this problem
Or at least give me a reply that “I am busy, sorry i can't help”
It is a request

Lil Doug - 5 days, 23 hours ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase are you comfortable with Fluid Mechanics? Can I ask doubt of that topic?
Thanks in advance

Lil Doug - 5 days, 23 hours ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...