I have seen that there is no **types of matrices** wiki present in brilliant. It is really a good topic so I have created a wiki to present before the community the types of matrices. But only I cannot complete it and definitely I need your help. You can contribute anything to this wiki. You can write theory or you can write different different examples. I have already created the subsections and mentioned what to write in some sections too. If I missed anything you can add them too. And also, if you want to discuss with me about anything you can keep them below in this note. Thank you in Advance.

Wiki link : Types of Matrices

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestI think it is much better for you to keep these pages separate, i.e. have one page on symmetric matrices and another on orthogonal matrices, and probably combine the theory of skew-symmetric matrices in the former page. If someone, say myself, was to help you out, I'd want this page to be comprehensive so that the reader can get a full understanding of the topic at hand; in doing this, you will find that the whole page can get very long and unwieldy, not just to read but also to write up.

I could write a few things about symmetric, skew-symmetric, orthogonal, unitary and Hermitian matrices, but I will only do so on separate pages. Besides, I have papers to write...

Log in to reply

Alternatively, you could use your Wiki page as a "landing page" with links to the separate pages; this way, you could just have a general definition at the start and have a link to the separate page, where you have more freedom to go in depth. I am happy to help you with this, though my schedule will be tight for the next 48 hours or so.

Log in to reply

But I think combining them will not be a problem as a good reader will not get bored to read a topic how long it may be.

Log in to reply

I disagree. You will have to cater to all types of readers on the Wiki pages; it attracts a different type of viewership, compared to the viewership of the discussion boards. Ultimately, it comes down to the "time is money" mantra; keep it short and simple, and do not force your readers into buying what you are selling.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin , @Chew-Seong Cheong , @Agnishom Chattopadhyay , @X X , @Pi Han Goh and orhers can you please help me

Log in to reply