Since \(q\) is an integer , \(7\) is forced to divide \(a_1\) which implies \(a_1=7 \Rightarrow q = 125 \times 10^{n-4}\).

Thus \(p=7\times 10^{n-1}+p = 10^{n-1}+125 \times 10^{n-4} = 10^{n-4}(7000+125) = \boxed{7125 \times 10^{n-4}}\) where \(n\) are number of digits of \(p\). So in general , these numbers are also in form \(\boxed{7125 \times 10^k \ \forall k \in \mathbb{Z}^+ + \{0\}}\).

Let the number be \(\bar { { a }_{ 1 }{ a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } \) The new number will be \(\bar { { a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } \)

\(\frac{\bar { { a }_{ 1 }{ a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } }{\bar { { a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } }=57 \\ \quad After \quad in \quad product \quad form \\ \frac{{a}_{1}}{\bar { { a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } }=56\)

Now by keeping factors try to find out the numbers.

Yes your numerator is incorrect. It is not true that \(\overline{a_1a_2a_3\dots a_n} - \overline{a_2a_3\dots a_n} = a_1\) . In fact it must be \(a_1 \times 10^{n-1}\) . Your solution implies that \(1987654-987654=1\) which is false and it must be \(1000000\) instead. BTW What is product form?

@Lakshya Sinha
–
Can you explain what is product form? Shouldn't the numerator be \( a_1 \times 10^{n-1} \), since you've only subtracted 1 from both sides?

Can you explain what "now by keeping factors" mean?

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestI am not that good in NT but still this is my try:

Let \(p=\overline{a_1a_2a_3 \dots a_n} \ , \ q=\overline{a_2a_3 \dots a_n}\) .

By given info. \(\dfrac{p}{q}=57 \Rightarrow \dfrac{p}{q}-1=56 \Rightarrow \dfrac{p-q}{q}=56 \\ \Rightarrow \dfrac{10^{n-1}a_1}{q} = 56 \Rightarrow q = \dfrac{10^{n-1}a_1}{56} = \dfrac{10^{n-4}a_1 \times 10^3}{56} = \dfrac{10^{n-4}a_1 \times 5^3}{7}\).

Since \(q\) is an integer , \(7\) is forced to divide \(a_1\) which implies \(a_1=7 \Rightarrow q = 125 \times 10^{n-4}\).

Thus \(p=7\times 10^{n-1}+p = 10^{n-1}+125 \times 10^{n-4} = 10^{n-4}(7000+125) = \boxed{7125 \times 10^{n-4}}\) where \(n\) are number of digits of \(p\). So in general , these numbers are also in form \(\boxed{7125 \times 10^k \ \forall k \in \mathbb{Z}^+ + \{0\}}\).

Log in to reply

Who said you are not good in Number Theory?

Log in to reply

Me. I can understand my strong/weak points better than anyone else.(This is actually applicable to all)

Log in to reply

Just multiply your answer by 10000

Log in to reply

No , not multiply. Just replace \(n-4 = k\). Has this solution helped you?

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Nah bro, its at least not in accordance to the answer key :(

Log in to reply

Is the number something \(71 \dots\) ?

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

I have completed my solution , do review it :)

Log in to reply

Let the number be \(\bar { { a }_{ 1 }{ a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } \) The new number will be \(\bar { { a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } \)

\(\frac{\bar { { a }_{ 1 }{ a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } }{\bar { { a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } }=57 \\ \quad After \quad in \quad product \quad form \\ \frac{{a}_{1}}{\bar { { a }_{ 2 }{ a }_{ 3 }......{ a }_{ n } } }=56\)

Now by keeping factors try to find out the numbers.

Log in to reply

Yes your numerator is incorrect. It is not true that \(\overline{a_1a_2a_3\dots a_n} - \overline{a_2a_3\dots a_n} = a_1\) . In fact it must be \(a_1 \times 10^{n-1}\) . Your solution implies that \(1987654-987654=1\) which is false and it must be \(1000000\) instead. BTW What is product form?

Log in to reply

Thanks, You gave the answer to the question yourself.

Log in to reply

Hm, in the second equation, are you missing a lot of 0's aren't you?

Log in to reply

By applying product form of a number and see the answer will be the same.

Log in to reply

Can you explain what "now by keeping factors" mean?

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Thanks for giving me the idea of subtracting \(1\) from both sides.

Log in to reply