Need some help with this.

How do we solve the following problem?

There are nn players participating in a sports tournament. Each player plays with every other player and each game ends in a win for one of the players (no draws). Prove that the players can be arranged in the following sequence: P1,P2,P3,,PnP_1, P_2, P_3, \ldots , P_n where, player PiP_i has beaten the player Pi+1(i=1,2,3,,n1)P_{i+1} (i=1,2,3, \ldots , n-1) in at least one game.

Note by Deeparaj Bhat
3 years, 5 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

I think, I have got a reasonable proof.I will be using induction.Consider the base case of two players.In two players, there will be a winner and a loser, so we can definitely form the sequence.Now,assume that we can form the given sequence for k players.So, we have the sequence P1,P2,P3,.........,Pk.We must now show that it is always possible to insert P (k+1) somewhere between the gaps of Pi (i=1,2,3.......,k).We know that P (k+1) will play exactly k games with each of P1,P2,......Pk.So,there will be k outcomes,where each of outcome is win (W) or lose (L).So,we consider the string of k letters where each letter is L or W.If at,say r(th) position,there is W,then it means that P (k+1) defeated Pr.Now,if first letter of the string is W,then P (k+1) will precede P1.Now,consider that the first letter of the string is L.If second letter is W,then P (k+1) comes between P1 and P2.Suppose second letter is L.Now,if third letter is W, then P (k+1) comes between P2 and P3.This logic can be extended,so as to get that,we can always find a consecutive L and W, if not, every letter of the string will be L.In that case P (k+1) will succeed Pk.So,it has been shown that it is always possible to form a sequence with (k+1) players.So,the question has been proved using induction.Does this solution seem fine?

Indraneel Mukhopadhyaya - 3 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Hmm... This seems fine. It resembles the proof I'd written in the exam very much (but I missed one crucial point in my written proof 😣).

Btw, is there partial credit?

Deeparaj Bhat - 3 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes,definitely there is partial credit. Does my solution take into account,the crucial point you are talking about?

Indraneel Mukhopadhyaya - 3 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Indraneel Mukhopadhyaya Yeah, it does. Only after you gave your proof did I realise that I was pretty close to the actual proof.

Once again, thanks for the proof!

Deeparaj Bhat - 3 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Indraneel Mukhopadhyaya

Did you write the CMI exam?

Deeparaj Bhat - 3 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Hey, @Indraneel Mukhopadhyaya when is your interview for ISI?

Deeparaj Bhat - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...