Today I have developed a general formula for the classic Irodov problem-

3 particles are kept at the vertices of an equilateral triangle of side \(a\).The velocity vector of the first particle continually points towards the second,the second towards the third and the third towards the first.After what time will they meet.Each moves with a constant speed \(v\).

Well for a regular \(n\) sided polygon ,

Working :

Well the usual stuff,figuring out relative velocities and then dividing the initial distance by the \(v_{rel}\) to get the time.Becuase the trajectory forms logarithmic spirals and maintains its symmetricity all throughout the motion.

Note that each angle of the polygon is given by \(\frac{(n-2)\pi}{n}\) therefore the exterior angle will be \(\frac{2\pi}{n}\).Resolving the velocity component along this direction,we get

\(v_{rel} =\) \(v - v cos \) \(\theta\) where \(\theta\) \(=\) \(\frac{2\pi}{n}\)

hence \(t =\) \(\frac{a}{v_{rel}}\) giving us our desired expression.

Note that for ,

\(n = 3\) we have \(t = 2a/3v\).

\(n = 4\) we have \(t = a/v\).

\(n = 6\) we have \(t = 2a/v\)

\(n = 12\) we have \(t =\) \(\frac{2a}{(2-\sqrt 3)v}\)

\(n = infinity\) we have \(t =\) \(infinity\) because now the path is a circle.

and so on.

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestThis problem was already posted by Deepanshu Gupta in 2015 or 2014. :)

Log in to reply

Great problem and extension!

Log in to reply

Thanks a lot !

Log in to reply

Wow that was fast. Helped me on Aops Physics, was doing this problem :)

Log in to reply

Great generalization!

Log in to reply

Even though this is well known. XD

Log in to reply