Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

Straightedge Only!

Given a segment, construct a perpendicular line to the segment using only the straightedge.

Note by John Ashley Capellan
2 years, 9 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 \( 2 \times 3 \)
2^{34} \( 2^{34} \)
a_{i-1} \( a_{i-1} \)
\frac{2}{3} \( \frac{2}{3} \)
\sqrt{2} \( \sqrt{2} \)
\sum_{i=1}^3 \( \sum_{i=1}^3 \)
\sin \theta \( \sin \theta \)
\boxed{123} \( \boxed{123} \)

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

Let's assume that perpendiculars can be drawn to any segment using a straightedge only. Given a circle, it becomes a trivial matter in locating the center of that circle, by first drawing two arbitrary chords, and then finding the midpoints of the chords (which is possible using a straightedge only and not using the circle), and then drawing the perpendiculars through them. But this is an impossibility as per Jacob Steiner's Theorem. Hence construction of a perpendicular to any line segment using a straightedge only is an impossibility.

However, by cheating, using a double edged straightedge, such as a common ruler, one can easily draw a rhombus, which diagonals are perpendicular.

As a note, given a line segment and any point not on it, a line through this point and parallel to the line segment can be constructed using a straightedge only. Unfortunately, one still cannot construct a true rhombus with this means alone.

Michael Mendrin - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...