Current means movement of charged particle; charged particle means mass ;and mass means that the particle can never reach the speed of light.....the max. speed it can reach is 99.9999% the speed of light. So I think the correct answer would be light.

Ordinary electric current in a wire is quite slow. Way way slower than light in vacuum, for example. Like the difference between a horse drawn wagon and the ISS in orbit. No, make that a snail and the ISS.

Edit: Even though electron drift velocity in a typical wire is very slow (in the order of fractions of a millimeter per second), the speed of the change in the electric field in a wire can approach light-like speeds. If this weren't true, electronic computers wouldn't be so fast. As an analogy, air molecules in the atmosphere takes a while to go from place to place, we call it "wind". But sound waves travel far faster than wind.

The beauty of this question hidden behind the actual definition of current. Flow of electric current is fastest among other currents. In our books we often study the electric current means the flow of electric charge. It meant that its the flow of electric charge and not electric charge carriers which is very slow, we cant even compare its speed to that of flow of charges in a current.

Charge usually travels quite slowly in a wire due to the fact that \(\ V = \frac{I}{nAq} \) (V = drift velocity, n = number of charge carriers, A = area of wire and q = electron charge = 1.6 \(\times\) \(\ 10^{-19} \) C ) and \(\ R = \rho \frac{L}{A} \) ( R = resistance in wire, \(\rho\) = resistivity and L = length of wire) because in the 1st equation we need a small area to produce a fast current but this causes more resistance. All other factors all limited by electrical capacity, resistivity of materials etc... Even if we propelled the charged particles they still have mass and hence will never reach the speed of light (they can get very close though).

The speed of current has multiple meanings. In everyday electrical and electronic devices, the signals or energy travel as electromagnetic waves typically on the order of 50% to 99% of the speed of light, while the electrons themselves move (drift) much more slowly.So ,the answer in an ideal case (i.e when resistance of conductor is 0),electron i.e current move with speed of light.

I didn't like the thought(aka thought) as it is not clear. "Which is faster" is a really bad question to ask. In what medium? It must be specified otherwise it will lead to misconception now that the theory of relativity has become much more common.

This question really doesn't want to test about the medium..as speed of current is not the speed of electrons..its the speed of electrons which will be affected.. current will spread with the speed with which electric field is setup in the conductor...In conductors field is said to be spreading with speed of light..thus both of them should be equal..

It's cannot be the same speed since the speed of spreading field is "about" the speed of light, so, it's not exactly the same. Also what do you define to be the "speed" of current? You have to state your question more clearly and according to Relativity, you can't have any types of information propagating at fatser speed than light.

It could be Current given a ideal medium or conducter . Because in an ideal cylindrical conducter (it could be of any shape , I took cylindrer to make my point clear ) which is filled with electrons and without any resistance or bond , the moment a electron enter , another electron would be pushed out from other side , that too in the time it would require oight to get from the point to ther point because electromagnetic and electrostatic effects travel at speed of light .

.
1) An electric field doesn't necessarily mean that "charges" are "flowing out somewhere". Think radio towers
2) Current is about moving charges
3) Changes in an electric field can move at light speeds, but that does not mean electrons move at light speeds too. Relativity makes it impossible for electrons to move at light speed
4) "Flow of electrons" has many different meanings. Do we mean the speed of individual electrons, or the group, or drift, speed of electrons? In any case, it's USUALLY far slower than speed of changes in EM field, i.e. e.g. light, or changes in EM in a conducting wire. Just because the drift speed of electrons in a wire is sub-millimeters per second, that does not mean it takes an hour to turn off a ceiling light.

Light is an electromagnetic wave, hence no matter only energy, whereas current is movement of electrons and ions in the conductor which behave as matter in this case hence is SLOWER than the em wave.

All right, all right, once again, an "electric current" involves moving charged particles, which are fermions, not bosons, and thus are difficult to accelerate to anything like the speed of light. Nevertheless, at the LHC facility at CERN, protons are accelerated to about 0.99999999 the speed of light. Still, in vacuum, light moves faster.

Under certain circumstances you could increase the speed of current by decrease the temperature and decrease the speed of light by passing it through a dense Medium . the speed of current is increased by using helium to cool it down to make it a super electro magnet

Example:In high-vacuum(-0.00007651 m(e.gr)/f.gr•2) if the strenght of foton/electron emission is equal for example 220v=6000lum then Light and Electricity would have the same speed as their particle energy level.Light 300,000,000 m/s - Electricity 750,000 m/s•2.

but I think current flows through a medium. Without medium current never exists. So its speed depends upon medium which justifies that current flow will vary in different mediums.

While light on the other hand needs no medium to travel so its speeds vary's minutly with medium change.

So according to my understanding they are completely different entitied and can not be compared for any of thier properties

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestCurrent means movement of charged particle; charged particle means mass ;and mass means that the particle can never reach the speed of light.....the max. speed it can reach is 99.9999% the speed of light. So I think the correct answer would be light.

Log in to reply

Ordinary electric current in a wire is quite slow. Way way slower than light in vacuum, for example. Like the difference between a horse drawn wagon and the ISS in orbit. No, make that a snail and the ISS.

Edit: Even though electron drift velocity in a typical wire is very slow (in the order of fractions of a millimeter per second), the speed of the change in the electric field in a wire can approach light-like speeds. If this weren't true, electronic computers wouldn't be so fast. As an analogy, air molecules in the atmosphere takes a while to go from place to place, we call it "wind". But sound waves travel far faster than wind.

Log in to reply

The beauty of this question hidden behind the actual definition of current. Flow of electric current is fastest among other currents. In our books we often study the electric current means the flow of electric charge. It meant that its the flow of electric charge and not electric charge carriers which is very slow, we cant even compare its speed to that of flow of charges in a current.

So In my opinion their speeds are equal.

Log in to reply

Charge usually travels quite slowly in a wire due to the fact that \(\ V = \frac{I}{nAq} \) (V = drift velocity, n = number of charge carriers, A = area of wire and q = electron charge = 1.6 \(\times\) \(\ 10^{-19} \) C ) and \(\ R = \rho \frac{L}{A} \) ( R = resistance in wire, \(\rho\) = resistivity and L = length of wire) because in the 1st equation we need a small area to produce a fast current but this causes more resistance. All other factors all limited by electrical capacity, resistivity of materials etc... Even if we propelled the charged particles they still have mass and hence will never reach the speed of light (they can get very close though).

Log in to reply

speed of charge particle is different from speed of current..

Log in to reply

I think that in an ideal case they will have the same speed of light

Log in to reply

well....can you explain..how??

Log in to reply

Lmao are you people serious

Log in to reply

Think so light

Log in to reply

The speed of current has multiple meanings. In everyday electrical and electronic devices, the signals or energy travel as electromagnetic waves typically on the order of 50% to 99% of the speed of light, while the electrons themselves move (drift) much more slowly.So ,the answer in an ideal case (i.e when resistance of conductor is 0),electron i.e current move with speed of light.

Log in to reply

I didn't like the thought(aka thought) as it is not clear. "Which is faster" is a really bad question to ask. In what medium? It must be specified otherwise it will lead to misconception now that the theory of relativity has become much more common.

Log in to reply

This question really doesn't want to test about the medium..as speed of current is not the speed of electrons..its the speed of electrons which will be affected.. current will spread with the speed with which electric field is setup in the conductor...In conductors field is said to be spreading with speed of light..thus both of them should be equal..

Log in to reply

It's cannot be the same speed since the speed of spreading field is "about" the speed of light, so, it's not exactly the same. Also what do you define to be the "speed" of current? You have to state your question more clearly and according to Relativity, you can't have any types of information propagating at fatser speed than light.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

In a same media

Log in to reply

For my words it's the speed of light which is faster

Log in to reply

1

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

I think it

Both Light and Current:It could be

Currentgiven a ideal medium or conducter . Because in an ideal cylindrical conducter (it could be of any shape , I took cylindrer to make my point clear ) which is filled with electrons and without any resistance or bond , the moment a electron enter , another electron would be pushed out from other side , that too in the time it would require oight to get from the point to ther point because electromagnetic and electrostatic effects travel at speed of light .On the other hand light has same speed .

So both have equal speed.

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Light is faster

Log in to reply

I think it is light..as no material can exceed the speed of light

Log in to reply

Guys don't get confused with the speed of current with speed of charges..

How fast current spreads into a medium think about that..!!

Log in to reply

.

1) An electric field doesn't necessarily mean that "charges" are "flowing out somewhere". Think radio towers

2) Current is about moving charges

3) Changes in an electric field can move at light speeds, but that does not mean electrons move at light speeds too. Relativity makes it impossible for electrons to move at light speed

4) "Flow of electrons" has many different meanings. Do we mean the speed of individual electrons, or the group, or drift, speed of electrons? In any case, it's USUALLY far slower than speed of changes in EM field, i.e. e.g. light, or changes in EM in a conducting wire. Just because the drift speed of electrons in a wire is sub-millimeters per second, that does not mean it takes an hour to turn off a ceiling light.

Log in to reply

no matter how fast it spreads into a medium....it can never exceed the speed of light...

Log in to reply

Can that be equal to the speed of light??

Log in to reply

SPEED OF LIGHT

Log in to reply

Current! Because it the source of Light!!

Log in to reply

Current is not the source of light always.Think of the sunlight.Is that because of current?

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Current

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Light of course.

Log in to reply

Light is faster. Electrical current means moviment of electrons or ions which have mass and particles with mass can't reach the speed of light.

Log in to reply

Light is an electromagnetic wave, hence no matter only energy, whereas current is movement of electrons and ions in the conductor which behave as matter in this case hence is SLOWER than the em wave.

Log in to reply

1

Log in to reply

All right, all right, once again, an "electric current" involves moving charged particles, which are fermions, not bosons, and thus are difficult to accelerate to anything like the speed of light. Nevertheless, at the LHC facility at CERN, protons are accelerated to about 0.99999999 the speed of light. Still, in vacuum, light moves faster.

Log in to reply

1

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Both move approx equal speed but light is slightly faster

Log in to reply

That is light

Log in to reply

Under certain circumstances you could increase the speed of current by decrease the temperature and decrease the speed of light by passing it through a dense Medium . the speed of current is increased by using helium to cool it down to make it a super electro magnet

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

1 - light

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

1

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

I think light ,is it right?

Log in to reply

Light travels at 299792458 m/s 1.0A in a Copper wire would travel at approximately 0.0023 cm/s

Log in to reply

Light is faster then current

Log in to reply

Lighg

Log in to reply

Both... considering superconductor

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Abviously light

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Example:In high-vacuum(-0.00007651 m(e.gr)/f.gr•2) if the strenght of foton/electron emission is equal for example 220v=6000lum then Light and Electricity would have the same speed as their particle energy level.Light 300,000,000 m/s - Electricity 750,000 m/s•2.

Log in to reply

1

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

3) Both move with equal speed

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Light

Log in to reply

Current

Log in to reply

Light

but I think current flows through a medium. Without medium current never exists. So its speed depends upon medium which justifies that current flow will vary in different mediums.

While light on the other hand needs no medium to travel so its speeds vary's minutly with medium change.

So according to my understanding they are completely different entitied and can not be compared for any of thier properties

Log in to reply

Light is faster. Speed of light is around 3 × 10^8 m/s. But current has a speed of only some millimeters per second..

Log in to reply

3) in ideal cases

Log in to reply

1.light

Log in to reply