# Trigonometry Identity Domain

The sum of tangents trigonometric identity gives us that

$\tan ( \alpha + \beta) = \frac{ \tan \alpha + \tan \beta} { 1 - \tan \alpha \tan \beta} .$

By letting $\alpha = \tan^{-1} x$ and $\beta = \tan^{-1} y$, the equivalent trigonometric identity on $\tan^{-1}$ is

$\tan^{-1} x + \tan^{-1} y = \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{x+y} { 1-xy} \right).$

Given that the arctangent function is restricted to the principle branch of $(- \frac{\pi}{2} , \frac{\pi}{2} )$. What is the actual domain for the arctangent identity? Can you find sufficient and necessary conditions? How do we show that these conditions are indeed sufficient and necessary?

This question arose from observing comments in Trigonometry Paradox, and seeing that various people had different sets which they felt would work. For example: Note by Calvin Lin
6 years, 1 month ago

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold
- bulleted- list
• bulleted
• list
1. numbered2. list
1. numbered
2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in $ ... $ or $ ... $ to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 $2 \times 3$
2^{34} $2^{34}$
a_{i-1} $a_{i-1}$
\frac{2}{3} $\frac{2}{3}$
\sqrt{2} $\sqrt{2}$
\sum_{i=1}^3 $\sum_{i=1}^3$
\sin \theta $\sin \theta$
\boxed{123} $\boxed{123}$

## Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

For what it's worth, Derek's condition $xy < 1$ and Aditya's condition $-\pi/2 < \tan^{-1} x + \tan^{-1} y < \pi/2$ (where the range of the inverse tangent is taken to be the open interval $(-\pi/2, \pi/2)$ ) are equivalent, necessary, and sufficient. Heli's condition (assuming all components must hold) clearly is not equivalent to the others, being a proper subset, and the counterexample $x = y = -1/\sqrt{3}$ shows it is not necessary.

I will leave the proof for other students to explore. It's a good exercise.

- 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Em I think how I understand this is like this If tan(x)=y then arctan(y)=d With d=x+2k*pi ( k is an integer ) and d is in (-pi/2;pi/2) We can apply the arctan t about any real number.

- 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

The arctangent function is defined to give a single value (which lies in the principle branch).

The 'alternative interpretation' of arctangent is that of a multivalued function, in which case the equality condition would be interpreted as a particular solution of the multivalued function (i.e. with a correct choice of variables $k_i$). However, students often do not have a good understanding of this concept, nor do they know what correct choice of variables work, which is why the above conundrum arises. Alternatively, you could interpret this question as "For what values of $x$ and $y$, does the equation hold with $k_x = k_y = 0$?"

Note: I believe you want $d = x + k\pi$ instead of $d = x + 2k\pi$, since we're working with tangent which has a period of $\pi$.

Staff - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Ahh yes , I often get confused. If ine just memorises the graph of the Arctan , it will help alot , and the variable work will only be an application f one's degree of understanding.

- 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...