Prove that highest power of 2 in \(2n!\) is strictly greater than the highest power of 2 in \(n!^2\).

This is kind of a corollary from another fundamental theorem. If you know that theorem, then this problem is nothing.

And this one is original to the best of my knowledge. I got it from the theorem.

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWhich theorem are u talking about ? that 2nCn is even? If thats the case we see :

Let us partition a set of 2n objects into 2 equal groups.We can definitely do such(e.g,a(1),a(2),...,a(n) in one group and others in the other.)----------------------- Let the number of ways of doing this be x(n).-------------------------- By definition x(n) is an integer. ----------------------From each of these partitions we get 2 unique ""n-combination of 2n objects"". -----------------------Conversely every ""n-combination of 2n objects"" paired with its conterpart gives one unique partition. -------------------So we form a 1-2 bijection between these 2 sets(the first of partitions and second of combinations). ----------------thus, by bijection principle ----------------------2nCn=2*x(n)=even.

Log in to reply

Nice! The logical version of what I posted. I've always found it hard to imagine scenarios in combinatorics where you get the results of what you want through the implications of the scenario. That's why I try to do things through mathematical calculation first and why I find combinatorics hard. But I always like reading solutions that are made in the way you did it : )

Log in to reply

## Thanks bro. And the best part is that your and my solution combined gives us another theorem:

## Number of ways to partition a set of 2n objects into equal groups is (2N-1)C(N).

## Though i am begining to sense a bijection to prove this but really this is not a trivial result!!!!!!!!!!!

Log in to reply

Comment deleted May 18, 2015

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

identicalthings into a given number ofdistinctgroups.Log in to reply

there is another elegant way by counting the number of ways of reaching the point (2n,n) in the pascal triangle this gives (try and see by breaking the path at the nth line)------------ 2nCn=---- sumi=0 to n [(nCi)^{2}] -------------if n is odd the (nCi)^{2} and (nCn-i)^{2} can be grouped and so sum is even.--------------- if n is even all other terms except nC(n/2) are grouped and their sum becomes even.--------------- For nC(n/2), simply , we use induction hypothesis!!!!(strong form of mathematical induction)

Log in to reply

Is this solution Okay? Its sort of extention of the pascal triangle proof

Log in to reply

Hint:

The theorem is this: \(\left(^{2n} _n\right)\) is always even. From this theorem, this corollary is pretty easy to arrive at. But can you prove this theorem?

Log in to reply

Here's how you prove that \((^{2n}_n)\) is even:

\((^{n}_r)=(^{n-1}_r)+(^{n-1}_{r-1})\)

Put n=2n, r=n and you get:

\((^{2n}_n)=(^{2n-1}_{n-1})+(^{2n-1}_n)\quad and\quad (^{2n-1}_n)=(^{2n-1}_{n-1})\)

Log in to reply

There is an easy way to prove the statement directly, though it essentially uses the same ideas.

Hint:\( \lfloor \frac{ 2n}{2^l} \rfloor \geq 2 \lfloor \frac{n}{2^l} \rfloor \).Hint:There exists \(k\) such that \( n < 2^k \leq 2n \).Log in to reply

Nice to know other direct methods :-) But I kinda developed the question from the theorem and it seemed to have an if and only if correspondence, so I decided to post it here.

I just got back from the exams and I've got many problems that I'm going to be posting here. It was really fun to solve all those challenging problems. And thanks to @Otto Bretscher 's problem, one more of those, I got the answer to a sub question pretty quickly. It was pretty much the same question : D

Log in to reply

Yay to solving hard problems via the "done before" method!

Log in to reply